data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97109/97109eebc03ab6349e1e0ee1dcc6d24fe277aed7" alt=""
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Author | Topic: My conclusions about deca. T/F?? | ||
Amateur Bodybuilder ![]() ![]() Posts: 222 |
In an earlier topic of mine I understood that nandrolone has the ability to DIRECTLY bind with progestorone receptors (it doesn't have to convert first). Could you please check if my next 2 conclusions make sense?? Conclusion 1: Getting deca-gyno has nothing to do with coincidence; you are prone to it or not. Conclusion 2: I've done a cycle before containing 400mg's deca per week with no sighns of gynacomnastia. If I don't exceed that dose in future cycles I don't have to worry about deca-gyno. ------------------ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||
Amateur Bodybuilder ![]() ![]() Posts: 68 |
both conclusions look good to me. ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||
Amateur Bodybuilder ![]() ![]() Posts: 228 |
Isn't it a coincidence if you are prone or not???? You don't know before hand that you are predisposed to gyno so it turns out to be a coincidence when you find out. ex. " I just finneshed a cycle of decca and I got gyno. It just so happens that coincidently, I happen to be predisposed to progesterone related gyno. Won't be touching decca again withought some good old fasion Winny" could be way off on this but that would make the first conclusion wrong. I am thinking way to hard on this one. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||
Amateur Bodybuilder ![]() ![]() Posts: 222 |
Bump for more opinions... ------------------ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
All times are ET (US) | |
![]() |