GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Enlightening Men about Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding for over Two Decades
|
 Elite Fitness Bodybuilding, Anabolics, Diet, Life Extension, Wellness, Supplements, and Training Boards
 Anabolic Discussion Board
 Sword In The Stone
|
| Author | Topic: Sword In The Stone | ||
|
Cool Novice 
Posts: 37 |
Been trying to figure this out, but haven't been able to and was wondering if you could pull the blade out for me. Here's the Q, what does it mean when people say Trenbolone Acetate is mg for mg three times stronger than test? Does this refer to receptor affinity or some other non-AR mechanism at work?     | ||
|
Freak 
Posts: 1689 |
ive never heard that but it could be the anabolic/androgenic ratio ------------------ | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder 
Posts: 53 |
I don't know exactly what your talking about. Trenbolone doesn't have good non receptor effects. T does and it binds well to the receptors. T doesn't bind to the receptor as well as trenbolone. | ||
|
Cool Novice
Posts: 37 |
bump, for answers | ||
|
Elite Bodybuilder 
Posts: 999 |
Keep in mind that the anabolic/androgenic ratios compare the anabolic properties of a compound to the androgenic properties of that same compound. That being said, tren is in fact 3 times as strong as test; test's A/A ratio is 1:1, tren's is (I believe--don't have any reference materials where I am now) 3:3. | ||
|
Moderator 
Posts: 3092 |
The Truth is correct....and hence the reason Parabolan was the shit!!!!!! Ranger |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
|
|
posted December 15, 2000 06:21 PM