GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Enlightening Men about Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding for over Two Decades
|
 Elite Fitness Bodybuilding, Anabolics, Diet, Life Extension, Wellness, Supplements, and Training Boards
 Anabolic Discussion Board
 T200 vs. SUS250
|
| Author | Topic: T200 vs. SUS250 | ||
|
Novice 
Posts: 2 |
Hey bros, Just need some input on the difference between T200 and SUS250. I know the T. is a bit more cost effective, but is it worth it on the first stack, and are there any other alternatives????
RAMSTACK ------------------     | ||
|
Pro Bodybuilder 
Posts: 435 |
hey Bro the major diff is T200 is animal anabolic and the sust250 is made for humans. The sust 250 in my book is way better than T200. The sust is a combination of several tests and works better, the T200 I believe is just enathate. | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder 
Posts: 107 |
Sustanon is way better than T200. Christ, sustanon is made up of for different Testos'-Testosterone Prop, Test phenylpropionate, Testo isocaproate, testo decanoate. The latters make such that it's a time released ester. Great stuff, no comparison in my view | ||
|
Moderator 
Posts: 4907 |
There are many alternatives and many differences between the two compounds. What do you want to know specifically? | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 170 |
I am a t200 vet, and i have to say, sust250 is better. If you havent tried the t200 then just believe me. You can get great gains from t200 but the pain and the worry is not worth the less cost. Expecially since it is way under filled. | ||
|
Elite Bodybuilder 
Posts: 821 |
A world of differences. I've taken both. If you want an answer in a nutshell... if you wanna grow, in my opinion, Sus250. I hardly got shit from T200 besides gyno. | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 174 |
Just to piggy back a litte. Both compounds will make you grow however I have made good gains off both compounds. The t200 is more cost effective by far than the sustanon if you are on a budget. remember both are depot testosterone, meaning long acting esters. tank | ||
|
Cool Novice 
Posts: 37 |
I have taken both, and i would take both again. But i would prefer Sus over the T-200 due to the way that it is manufactured and that it is made for humans...Fooz | ||
|
Cool Novice
Posts: 35 |
what is the difference between the two in how long it is out of a piss test | ||
|
Moderator
Posts: 4907 |
There is no difference in a urine test since both have long lasting esters. | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 83 |
Im sure sus is a higher quality product, but if youre an athlete that trains mostly every day, the sore ass thing is just not do-able. anyone have any suggestions? is aratest as bad on making your ass sore? thanks | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 51 |
i would say that if you want less bloat go with the sust but i had more strength gains with the enthanate, which i attributed to the extra water i was holding, so its up to the users wishes. ------------------ | ||
|
Cool Novice
Posts: 11 |
I just got done talking to a friend who has done both T200 and Sust 250 several months apart. His cycles were very similar, diets and workouts about the same, but he got a lot more muscle definition from the enanthate. Anyone else agree with this? From what I've read and heard, enanthate should've led to more water retention, not more definition than the sust. Any thoughts on this? - PM |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
|
|
posted December 05, 2000 07:51 PM