GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Enlightening Men about Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding for over Two Decades
|
 Elite Fitness Bodybuilding, Anabolics, Diet, Life Extension, Wellness, Supplements, and Training Boards
 Anabolic Discussion Board
 polysteron 250 by Organon or sus 250 by Schering, which is better
|
| Author | Topic: polysteron 250 by Organon or sus 250 by Schering, which is better | ||
|
Cool Novice 
Posts: 14 |
wondering if anybody has experience with both and can recommend. very pleased with sus 250 and have heard poly is even better. any truth to this?     | ||
|
Pro Bodybuilder 
Posts: 359 |
from what i've read, poly is better | ||
|
Pro Bodybuilder
Posts: 486 |
They are both made by organon. The "sus" blend of testosterone is manufactured by organon under different names in different countries. Polysteron is made in Argentina, duratestin is made in Mexico I think and sustenon is made in european, asian and middle eastern countries like Egypt (Nile co.), Pakistan (Karachi), and Russia. Omnadren is the same formula as sustenon but it is made by Jelfa in Poland. While I have been told that the Polys are some of the best, a.k.a. have the highest concentration, I can not really tell a difference between them and most other forms of sustenon. My suggestion would be to go with the cheapest legit form you can find. At this point in time I am not convinced that sus has any advantages over a good form of cypionate or enanthate so if you can get another quality form of test for cheaper then go for it. Later, | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder 
Posts: 230 |
I do have one question. All these Sus 250s listed are made in other countires for use in the respected countries and to be shipped else where. So why are all the printings on the diffrent Sus 250s from diffrent countries all in English?? Was always wondering that. |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
|
|
posted November 13, 2000 05:20 PM