x
Almost there! Please complete this form and click the button below to gain instant access.
EliteFitness.com FREE Email Series: How You Can Use Winstrol, Masteron, HGH, and Testosterone for a Perfect, Muscular Physique!
- -
We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe.
- -
  Elite Fitness Bodybuilding, Anabolics, Diet, Life Extension, Wellness, Supplements, and Training Boards
   Anabolic Discussion Board
  Is a nandralone a nandralone?

Post New Topic  
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

Author Topic:   Is a nandralone a nandralone?
Dr.Atlas

Pro Bodybuilder

Posts: 306
From:Grand Rapids, MI USA
Registered: Feb 2000

posted October 23, 2000 06:41 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged


Reading some of the fine references available on the net, many will cite one nandralone (example undecanoate) as being more (or less) androgenic as another ester (say proprionate). Is there any basis, aside from personal experience/anecdote, for making that statement? Some esters do have shorter half-lives (like proprionate above) and some have lower proportions of active ingredient by weight depending on the ester. Really though, is there a scientific reason for saying one ester is more anabolic or androgenic when they both have the same base? Same holds true for testosterones... I'm curious. Peace!

------------------
Learning medicine for the benefit of the Iron Brothers (and Sisters, God bless them)


Click Here to See the Profile for Dr.Atlas   Click Here to Email Dr.Atlas     Edit/Delete Message      Reply w/Quote
d1734

Pro Bodybuilder

Posts: 519
From:
Registered: Feb 2000

posted October 23, 2000 07:12 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged


according to bill roberts no, an ester is an ester. he said something to the effect that as long as the drug is administered once per half life it will all be the same regardless of the ester.


Click Here to See the Profile for d1734   Click Here to Email d1734     Edit/Delete Message      Reply w/Quote
cockdezl

Pro Bodybuilder

Posts: 425
From:
Registered: 2000

posted October 24, 2000 08:14 AM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged


In terms of the drug itself, a nandrolone is a nandrolone, no matter the ester. The receptors only recognizes the free nandrolone. In terms of the pharmacokinetics, then yes, there can be a difference in effect due to esters. Essentially, the shorter the half-life and release rate, the stronger it tends to be due to higher peak levels. Think of a graph that spikes upwards fast and high, but then drops quickly too...this would be representative of the short acting ester. Now think of a curve that slowly rises, but never reaches the same peak level of the shorter ester...this is the long acting esters. This is the problem with the undecanoates. The ester is too long and slows down the release so that the drug only reaches moderate levels, but stays there for a very long time. It would require a very high initial dose to get supraphysiological levels.


Click Here to See the Profile for cockdezl     Edit/Delete Message      Reply w/Quote
Stan O'Zolol

Novice

Posts: 4
From:Ste. Roid, Quebec
Registered: Oct 2000

posted October 24, 2000 07:21 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged


If what you are asking is "Will I see more androgenic side effects with one ester vs. another?", then yes, due to the reasons Cockdezl mentioned, you will. Will the inherent androgenicity of the drug change? No. Will the androgenic/anabolic ratio change? Yes and no.


Click Here to See the Profile for Stan O'Zolol   Click Here to Email Stan O'Zolol     Edit/Delete Message      Reply w/Quote

All times are ET (US)

Post New Topic  
Hop to:

�2016 EliteFitness.com. All rights reserved.