x
Almost there! Please complete this form and click the button below to gain instant access.
EliteFitness.com FREE Email Series: How You Can Use Winstrol, Masteron, HGH, and Testosterone for a Perfect, Muscular Physique!
- -
We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe.
- -
  Elite Fitness Bodybuilding, Anabolics, Diet, Life Extension, Wellness, Supplements, and Training Boards
   Anabolic Discussion Board
  Short Cycles??? What's really better?

Post New Topic  
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

Author Topic:   Short Cycles??? What's really better?
Loophole Genetics

Amateur Bodybuilder

Posts: 117
From:USA
Registered: Aug 2000

posted October 12, 2000 06:08 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged


I just read Huckleberrys thread on short cycles. I learned more from that thread than I have from most. Good post, Huck Fina. I, myself, have never tried a short cycle. I'm just wondering, out of everyone who has done long and short cycles, which do you prefer, and why? All of your opinions will help me and everybody else thats still here wondering out, alot.


Click Here to See the Profile for Loophole Genetics   Click Here to Email Loophole Genetics     Edit/Delete Message      Reply w/Quote
~Goku~

Amateur Bodybuilder

Posts: 142
From:Luxembourg
Registered: Feb 2000

posted October 12, 2000 08:11 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged


I prefer cycles longer eight weeks the least.
I reason that if you do shorter cycles the juice your taking cannot be used to it's full potential.

~Goku~

[This message has been edited by ~Goku~ (edited October 12, 2000).]


Click Here to See the Profile for ~Goku~     Edit/Delete Message      Reply w/Quote
The Bull

Amateur Bodybuilder

Posts: 185
From:
Registered: Jul 2000

posted October 12, 2000 08:13 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged


Bump. It usually takes 3-4 weeks for test to really react in the body, thus an 8-10 week cycle would be more apropiate to do.
Only an opinion though.

------------------
What you lookin' at!!!!


Click Here to See the Profile for The Bull   Click Here to Email The Bull     Edit/Delete Message      Reply w/Quote
HUCKLEBERRY FINNaplex

Guru

Posts: 2010
From:Timbuktu
Registered: Aug 2000

posted October 12, 2000 08:42 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged


I agree,longer acting esters,that take some time to build up to the saturation point,have no business in a short cycle.There's many variables to be played with here though.Orals/fast acting injectables will reach saturation levels very quickly,and a state of positive nitrogen balance can be had very quickly as well.PLUS, you never shut down H-P-T-A function,so recovery/gains kept are very positive results.Not saying I believe either approach to be better than the other,just to keep an open mind.....


Click Here to See the Profile for HUCKLEBERRY FINNaplex     Edit/Delete Message      Reply w/Quote
Maverik

Elite Bodybuilder

Posts: 643
From:Top Gun Flight School!!
Registered: Sep 2000

posted October 12, 2000 10:35 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged


Damn Huck, you are almost a guru. Now if I could just get my posts back, maybe I would be too.


Click Here to See the Profile for Maverik   Click Here to Email Maverik     Edit/Delete Message      Reply w/Quote
Triple H

Amateur Bodybuilder

Posts: 91
From:Canada
Registered: Feb 2000

posted October 12, 2000 11:33 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged


I haven't tried a short cycle ever. Not even
a 6 weeker. I usually am on 12 weeks. This fall I did a 21 week cycle (just because I did a show this fall) and I think I probably didn't make any "extra" gains that I normally would have made with a cycle half the length.

I am waiting for 3 months and then start up
with a basic offseason Test, Deca, D-Ball stack and want to try something short like 6 on 6weeks off, 6on again.
Triple H

[This message has been edited by Triple H (edited October 12, 2000).]


Click Here to See the Profile for Triple H   Click Here to Email Triple H     Edit/Delete Message      Reply w/Quote
Loophole Genetics

Amateur Bodybuilder

Posts: 117
From:USA
Registered: Aug 2000

posted October 13, 2000 08:21 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged


Thanks for all the info guys, I appreciate it. I myself just really enjoy being 'on'. The longer the better. I feel great the entire time I'm on. After my current cycle, I may try a short cycle, just out of curiousity. Can test. propianate be considered in a short cycle, since it is sort of fast acting?


Click Here to See the Profile for Loophole Genetics   Click Here to Email Loophole Genetics     Edit/Delete Message      Reply w/Quote

All times are ET (US)

Post New Topic  
Hop to:

�2016 EliteFitness.com. All rights reserved.