Im not saying the enathate is a shit product. But Sus250 is preferable.

------------------
legend

When you take the Sustanon weekly, you really are defeating the purpose of the mixture. It's intended use was so that a therapeutic dose of Sustanon could be administered once every three to four weeks for a steady testosterone level in the body for that length of time. The four esters break off at different time intervals making the testosterone bioavailable in the body for that purpose.

Now, testosterone enanthate is a longer ester, so one won't see results from the testosterone as quickly as Sustanon, but results will happen. 500 mg of Enanthate will contribute to the body nearly an equal amount of testosterone as Sustanon, especially when taken weekly, twice a week, or more often as most will do. Test is test is test. That's what matters.

Cost per mg is another factor. The enanthate is MUCH cheaper. Personally, I would go with the enanthate. Way more bang for the buck.

I agree test is test but that doesnt mean they are all equal - as you know the time releases are different, Sus250 keeps your 'levels' for lack of a better word more even throught the entire cycle from start to end, while enethate will take a while then hit you all at once with that concentration of 500mg or whatever you take.

Go here (courtesy of 300 Kleens new board)and compare test enethate with sus250 I know this isn't the Bible but just to clear things up a bit. (Take special note of ability to keep gains and sides)

http://www.angelfire.com/linux/roids/AnabolixRanking.htm

And I hate to quote the board again, but I like a new board and read the hell out of it when I can =)
------
Sustanon is a very popular steroid which is highly appreciated by its users since it offers several advantages when compared to other testosterone compounds. Sustanon is a mixture of four different testosterones which, based on the well-timed composition, have a synergetic effect. This special feature has two positive characteristics for the athlete. First, based on the special combination effect of the compounds, Sustanon, milligram for milligram, has a better effect than Testosterone enanthate, cypionate, and propionate alone.Second, the effect of the four testosterones is time-released so that Sustanon goes rapidly into the sytem and remains effective in the body for several weeks. Due to the propionate also included in the steroid, Sustanon is effective after one day and, based on the mixed-in decanoates, remains active for 3-4 weeks. Sustanon has a distinct androgenic effect which is coupled with a strong anabolic effect. Therefore it is well suited to build up strength and mass. A rapid increase in body strength and an even increase in body weight occur. Athletes who use Sustanon report a solid muscle growth since it results in less water retention and also aromatizes less than either testosterone enanthate or cypionate. Indeed many bodybuilders who use testosterone and fight against distinct water retention and an elevated estrogen level prefer Sustanon over other long-acting depot testosterones.

I also think it would be better for your body as the test is level througout instead of hitting hard at a more concentrated period of time. Let me know what you think.

Slopain

But, I do have some problems with that quote you gave concerning Sustanon.

First, it uses the word "synergetic" for the effect of the testosterone blend. I cannot see how this applies. Synergy is defined as "working together", as in different people or things working together for a better result or effect. ECA is a good example of that. Each component of the stack is good on its own, but the combination, in the right quantities produces an effect that is greater than the whole. Sustanon is made as a blend that, when the esters break off, the testosterone is made available to the body at different time intervals. Hence, the name of the drug comes from "sustain". Therefore, the esters really do not work "together", as they are used by the body at different times. If it does have a synergistic effect, it does not say how.

Enanthate is known to break off from testosterone in the body after a peroid of about 10-14 days. If one injects enanthate twice or three times a week, the blood levels of testosterone will be relatively consistent, and then drop off slowly for the three weeks after the last injection. This sounds much like the mechanism behind Sustanon, right?

Second, the quote you gave also gave some information about the androgenic and anabolic qualities of Sustanon. That also directly applies to the enanthate, since it's the testosterone, plain and simple, that is the cause of the androgenic and anabolic qualities. The esters play no role in that part. Once the ester is removed, it is inert.

500 mg Sustanon will have slightly more testosterone in it than enanthate. Why? This is due to the size of the esters. Enanthate is one of the longer ones, where the Sustanon has some short ones in it to make it faster acting. The shorter ones weigh less, there for the ratio of testosterone to ester is larger in Sustanon. This would be the only case where the enanthate would be slightly less effective, but I don't feel that it is significant.

If you only want to inject Sustanon every three to four weeks, go for it. That's it's intended purpose. But, for the bros here that want to pack on some serious size, that ain't going to cut it. We need more testosterone, and we want it now. Therefore, we inject more testosterone, and we inject it more often. This defeats the purpose of the Sustanon blend.

About the synergy I thought the same thing. But can't explain it like you

Anyway to anyone that cares..

I have used sust and enanthate both are karachi the sust is from organon and the enanthate is schering testoviron depot
if I recall (brown amps at 250mg/ml)

I thought the sust's where super until I tried the enanthate. Atleast this kind seems better... I said SEEMS.

I believe that TEST = TEST = TEST but next cycle I will leave nothing to chance and get half sust and half enant.

Don't anyone take this as a flame, I think this is a great debate, and it reminds my of the old days - where the mods used to battle things out in an intelligent manner.

My thoughts are that if you can afford it take the sus250 - if you cant enanthate is a great substitute. I am from the school that I will easily spend any amount of money on my body, as that is something you can't sell or get rid of later in life because you don't like it or dont like what the things you have put into it has done to you.

Im afraid some people are not comparing apples to apples when it comes to these two tests. Its hard to take empirical evidence here as I know that many of us do not do controlled expirements with the drugs, but rather just go on cycles with other AS and if one cycle worked out better than the rest well it must be because every drug in that cycle was better, this is not entirely true. How can you be sure than all the drugs were correctly dosed or authentic even? I know thats is all we have to go on, but its just something to think about.

Again (for the third time lol) I think both are good!