The short cycle approach assumes that you can trick your body into never slef adjusting for the added test. The idea is to hit your body hard and fast and then go off. This then would eliminate the use of all long esters such as ethanate and cyp. If you were to base your short cycle around test prop or even dbol, your body would clear the drug quick enough to minimilize natural test reduction. FOr example, 50mg of prop and 40 mg dbol per day for 3 weeks would give you decent gains but probably would not alter your natural test production too much. If you stay off for say 2 to 3 wks and repeat you could possibly repeat indefinately. This all ofcourse depends on how quickly your body down regulates natural test production. I know of no way except for weekly doc visits to know how long this may take. If your body adjusts quickly, you have defeated the whole purpose. Many of these short cycles could lead to what a single well planned 12 to 14 wk cycle would achieve. I think for the most part that longer cycles provide the best path towards growth because you give your body enough time to use what it needs to grow. If you are careful and come off your long cycle the right way, your body never knows the difference. Most of my cycles contain both long and short cycles. I base every cycle on some kind of test. Within a 12 week test base, I will vary my intake of dbol, deca, primo or anadrol. My current cycle began with sust and 2 wks of dbol followed by 2 wks of anadrol, nothing other than test for a few weeks then deca for 4...etc.

The key to any cycle is not so much the gear as it is everything else working together. If you can not diet properly, short cycles wil not work. YOu must eat incredibly high amounts of food to get any advantage. Long cycles on the other hand do allow for a few lazy days. The same can be said for your training.

Good luck.

------------------
300 kleen