data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97109/97109eebc03ab6349e1e0ee1dcc6d24fe277aed7" alt=""
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Author | Topic: Is Cardio The Answer?? |
gdspeed Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 5) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I started the 10-week size surge routine two weeks ago, and at the beginning I weighed in at 150lbs, and 19%BF. After weeks I weighed myself in again, and I am 19-1/2%BF, and 153lbs. My weghts and stregnth have all increased, but I had figured by adding new muscle, and keeping my calories consistent I would decrese my BF a little. Although I don't know exactly what my calorie intake is I try to keep it at about 40% Protein, 40% Carbs, and 20% Fat. I eat about 5-6 meals a day. Do you think it would be better to concentrate on lowering my calories, and fat, or to add 2-3 days of cardio. At the present time I dont do any cardio?? Thanks In Advance IP: Logged |
el cubano Moderator (Total posts: 639) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() If your goal is to decreas body fat, cardio is a must, in conjunction with a clean diet. Do cardio for 30 minutes per day 3-5 times per week. I usually do it about 3-4 times per week all year round. ------------------ IP: Logged |
hayesjones Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 63) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() dont drop your calories anymore. If you havent done cardio then you will be in for a nice surprise when you start! Try to do it in the morning on an empty stomach and try to incorporate only fibrous carbs at your last meal(vegetables). At 19% you will drop alot at first. When you start to feel like you are hitting a plateau then you can start staggering low and high carb days. goood luck IP: Logged |
cabexbx Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 7) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() el cubano, I'm just curious as to why you think cardio is the key here? I'm not trying to get into a long drawn out debate, but I would like to hear your explanation. I've come to the conclusion on my own that diet is the major factor and aerobics are important for cardiovascular health, but not such a great method of fat burning. I won't go through the whole thing again but if you look at sprinters compared to long distance runners, which group is more cut and muscular. Take any long endurance athelte, bicyclists, swimmers, etc who's training entails primarily of aerobic activity and the majority of them are not cut at all. Anyway I'd just like to hear your view on the matter. IMO some type of activity that involves short bursts of maximal or near maximal effort (whether it's running, biking, stair climbing) with intervals of walking, jogging, slowly biking, etc is a much more effective way to decrease BF. IP: Logged |
gdspeed Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 5) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Bump IP: Logged |
el cubano Moderator (Total posts: 639) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Cabexbx, I'm not trying to make fun of you but your thinking is way out of whack. You say endurance atheletes aren't cut, but why is that? Is it because the cardio isn't burning fat? Or, the more logical reason, is it because these atheltets are not big and muscular, thus not showing off there extremely low body fat percentage as well as a bodybuilder who has huge muscles! Endurance atheletes are cut but just don't have the muscle size to show it. Endurance atheletes do not want to have big muscles because it slows them down. More muscle means more body weight and more body weight means you burn more energy which is not conducive to there profession. Now to say that cardio isn't the key to cutting up is utterly ridiculous. True, diet is very important, but gdspeed already stated that he has a clean diet and dropping calories when on a "size surge routine", as he states he's on, would cause him to lose size while he cuts. He should keep the calories up to continue to build muscle and add some cardio to burn off the fat. True cardio may hinder gains a bit, but not as much as lowering calories without cardio. While on steroid cycles the calories should be kept average to high or else you are wasting them. As a matter of fact, if he does incorporate 5 days of cardio to his routine I'd suggest that he increase his caloric intake, especially the protein and carb portion. ------------------ IP: Logged |
Bjaarki Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 167) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I was just as stumped as the Cuban about cabexbx's description of endurance athletes as not "cut," but I disagree with the Cuban about the necessity of aerobics, and really found myself more in agreement with cabexbx on that point. I don't think there is any substantive evidence that aerobic exercise is a better "fat burner" than weight lifting, or is really necessary when a responsible diet is maintained. I'm pretty sure that interest in aerobics, or cardio as we call it in the iron game, is waning in emphasis in exercise physiology. Remember the 70's, when it was all the rage? Those days are gone. BTW gdspeed, I think your carb consumption is way too high. I find a high protein, moderate fat, very low carb diet keeps me leanest. I'm at about 12 percent right now, which is low for me, and only got that way when I stopped avoiding peanut butter, and started avoiding carbs except fruits and an occasional starch my wife cooks. Just my $.02, gentlemen. Glad to see some animated disagreements among the brothers, so long as we keep it all respectful. Bjaarki ------------------ BECOME SOMEONE'S HERO! IP: Logged |
ajc1977 Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 767) |
![]() ![]() ![]() Cardio tends to burn calories from fat stores (adipose tissue), and not glycogen stores (from food). This is why you can't just skip that 30 minute cardio session and cut your daily calorie intake by 300-400 calories to get the same effect. ------------------ IP: Logged |
ripped to shreads2 Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 110) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() i once read that swimers dont lookcut because they are always in the water and theyr skin dewelops an extra leyer of fat forgot the reason why, and i dont know what endurence athletes you see that are not cut, look at marathon runers, sprinters, those people are fucking ripped IP: Logged |
Bjaarki Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 167) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() AJC1977: What I said I was looking for was "substantive evidence" that cardio burns fat better than weightlifting. Burning fat stores vs. food has something to do with the time of the exercise and recent food intake, very little (if anything) to do with the form of exercise. There's a lot of bullshit out there about cardio buring Kcals from fat, at least after a 20 minute duration, but this stuff is all from guesswork based on ambiguous evidence based on speculation. The sad fact is that we just don't know much about exercise or diet physiology. We know so little, in fact, that the high carb diet was touted a few years back as the best cutting diet in the world, NFL players were through the 1970's instructed not to lift because of its effects on flexibility and joint management, we still don't know what causes DOMS, etc., etc., etc.. There's a lot of bullshit out there, bros. A lot of bullshit. Few things are more lame than conclusions prematurely arrived at and firmly held. Use your heads, and don't buy everything somebody tells you, especially when it's dolled up in some "latest thing / cutting edge" drag. Again, just my $.02. Keep up the god work. Bjaarki ------------------ BECOME SOMEONE'S HERO! IP: Logged |
markp Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 113) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I'm still not to clear on this cardio thing. I've read all the science, staying in the 70% heart rate thing, doing it after lifting or in the morning so that your glycogen stores are already depleted allowing you to go into fat burning mode faster. Well, here is the situation at my gym. 50% of the gear heads do cardio and 50% don't. 100% of the gear heads are big and shreaded. I mean very ripped. Some people say you need it, other say building enough muscle and eating right will get you ripped. I would like to see some _REAL _numbers on the amount of FREAKING ADIPOSE TISSUE that is utilized for energy during a 30-40 minute cardio session. A large study with different people, situations, and diets and exactly HOW MUCH is burned during the cardio for various groups (ie, people who ate 1/2 hour ahead of time, people who lifted first, people with 8-10% bf, people with 10-15% bf.. and so forth) LETS SEE SOME GOD DAMN NUMBERS. THAT would settle it either way. </End Rant> [This message has been edited by markp (edited July 31, 2000).] IP: Logged |
MS Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 642) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() OK. You put up the half million dollars to fund the research and I'll do the study. Seriously, to control for all the variables while doing accurate measurements on fuel burned on all sorts of different people.......It's just not likely to happen. I think in the mean time to try several different approaches and find what works best for you. If you hate cardio sooooo much that you want to slit your wrists at the thought of doing it, then by all means cut your calories, increase your resistance training, do some sprint work, take clen, DNP, T3 or whatever. But also remember there have been more Olympic physiques shredded with the help of cardio than without! That's not science, just anecdote. But anecdotal evidence is what most members of this board base their gear cycles on. IP: Logged |
FoeLife Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 34) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Bjaarki, you said that you got that way (12% bf) when you stopped avoiding peanut butter? Not looking to get flamed but just wondered what this change did for you (or anyone else for that matter) and how did you incorporate that into your diet. Trying to cut my bf% now and always thought that peanut butter was a no-no. Any help on this matter from anyone is apprecitated....Thanks bros!! IP: Logged |
Bjaarki Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 167) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() FoeLife: I cut my BF by avoiding carbs, not by including fats. I just found I didn't have to avoid fats, so long as I kept carb intake low. I just don't think that carbs are good for human physiology. We've only been eating high levels of carbs for a few thousand years. We were eating high levels of protein and fats a long time before that. Bjaarki ------------------ BECOME SOMEONE'S HERO! IP: Logged |
el cubano Moderator (Total posts: 639) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() OK, Bjaarki, Just point out to me where I said that cardio was a better fat burner than weight training and I'll take back my opinoin of you not having a clue! Why in the hell is it so hard for people to just read and understand what they are reading? It seems like everyone reads shit and then puts in their own lines to make up some shit that you never said? Seriously, this is about the 2000th time someone has said that they disagree with something I said that I didn't say? WHAT THE FUCK IS UP? OK, cardio burns fat. OK, weight training burns fat. OK, it is possible to lose body fat through proper dieting. Do all three and you'll be as ripped as FUCK! THE END! ------------------ IP: Logged |
Beezers Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 156) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() "Do all three and you will be ripped as FUCK!" Thats the main point here. Either three will burn body fat, but combine all three and you end up with one productive way to burn body fat all working together to turn yourself into one efficiant fat burning machine. IP: Logged |
Mr. Nobody Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 258) |
![]() ![]() ![]() let me add a 4th one: increase your resting metabolism with supplements: eca, t3, clen, fina, dnp.... IP: Logged |
cabexbx Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 7) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Well maybe I do have it all wrong, but it works for me. I personally don't believe you have to do cardio to get cut. Do you believe that the sprinters do cardio and that's why they are cut? Can you explain that? As far as why the endurance athletes don't look cut I don't believe it's due to the fact that they just aren't as muscular. Even if you weighed a buck o five and had extra low BF you'd still be able to see definition. I think the more likely reason the endurance athletes (especially long distance runners and bikers) look smooth is that they have to carry extra fat for their energy stores to use while they exercise. Does that make sense? I don't think my logic is flawed in this way and I know what works for me. Plus I hate to do 30 mins of cardio when I can get the same results in 12 mins. But to each his own and if you have something that works for you, you might as well stick with it. IP: Logged |
riskybiz007 Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 134) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() i found that running in the morning before breakfast is best. And sprinters are by far more cut than long dist. runners because of their explosive and short intense exercise, much like body builders. Runners eat so so so much carbs and hardly any protein and they're like the hard gainers at the gym who spend hours and hours at the gym. IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | |
![]() |