GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Enlightening Men about Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding for over Two Decades
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
 George Spellwin's ELITE FITNESS Discussion Boards
 Anabolic Discussion Board
 sust vs t200??
|
| Author | Topic: sust vs t200?? |
|
beta Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 24) |
posted July 18, 2000 03:36 AM
  
Alright, gong to start my first cycle, but cant decide what to stack with the deca, t200 or sust your opinions are needed what is better, least sides, and safty?? please help time is running out. none of my friends are taking clomid,I know I need to, is it easy to find??(in a local state) IP: Logged |
|
JuiceBoy Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 307) |
posted July 18, 2000 04:07 AM
all I gotta say is that t200 is less than half the price and will basically do the same shit for you and I dont' care what anybodys says about self-tapering, 4 different peaks, and any other kind of crap. Just my .2 IP: Logged |
|
ironmaster Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 250) |
posted July 18, 2000 04:30 AM
I don't know that test is a better deal. When you figure in the underdosing and underfilling common in t200, and that the sust. is a better, cleaner product (if legit), I think the real cost is about the same. No dis, juice boy. Probably comes down to what you can get and at what price. And I have done good with t200, but better with sust. IP: Logged |
|
JuiceBoy Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 307) |
posted July 18, 2000 04:43 AM
Iron that's true man, however have u gotten a chance to check out the new t200? since brovel took over tornel? It's got a blue plastic top and a brovel hologram sticker on it. It's no longer underdosed or underfilled, but sterility remains to be in question, but like you said it just comes down to personal preference. IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
|
|