GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Enlightening Men about Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding for over Two Decades
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
 George Spellwin's ELITE FITNESS Discussion Boards
 Anabolic Discussion Board
 Are today's A.S. stronger/better than yesteryears?
|
| Author | Topic: Are today's A.S. stronger/better than yesteryears? |
|
jersey boy Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 158) |
posted July 02, 2000 10:24 PM
  
Mightydog brought up an interesting point about liquid D that he came across 10 or so years ago. In my opinion drugs like A-50 from syntex (white), Foil wrapped Sust, and the old blue d-bol 5mg (don't know if they are still around) were by far stronger regardless of what the labels say than the A.S. found today. Any takers?
IP: Logged |
|
MattTheSkywalker Moderator (Total posts: 1141) |
posted July 02, 2000 10:29 PM
Disagree. Look at today's Mr Olympias compared to those of 20 years ago. Arnold is the legend but you can't really compare his physique to Dorian's or Ronnie's - and training hasn't changed in 25 years. Matt IP: Logged |
|
jersey boy Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 158) |
posted July 02, 2000 10:33 PM
I'm not necessarily talking about the inclusion of insulin, GH, Thyroid, and the mega doses of today's top BB's. But pill for pill of purely A.S.. get big or get out IP: Logged |
|
Curious Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 254) |
posted July 02, 2000 10:48 PM
The D-Bol that you find today is nothing like the old stuff Ciba made. It just doesn't compare. As far as why the bodybuilders of today are much larger is because they take much larger doses and there are much more different kinds of steroids. Those like Arnold and company took were much smaller doses. To get HGH back in the old days you had to get it out of a cadaver. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
MiracleMan Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 141) |
posted July 03, 2000 12:20 AM
Yes, thay are much cleaner, more effective and less overall toxic. Technology advances so does the drugs. Only in America IP: Logged |
|
Recoome Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 48) |
posted July 03, 2000 03:35 AM
Maybe today's drugs seem weaker because most of them are fake/counterfeit. Back than they were all real... IP: Logged |
|
Jeff_rys Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 341) |
posted July 03, 2000 08:59 AM
You are right Matt, you cannot compare Arnold from 1975 with Dorian and Ronnie from 2000. But if Arnold was born 30 years later, in my opinion, he would still be the best, that's his character, his nature, the drift he has to win. But only if he had access to the same drugs Ronnie is taking. Jeff ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Krusher Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 298) |
posted July 03, 2000 09:19 AM
A friend of mine who is an old-timer used to get those blue d-bol for $7 per 100. He would take 4 tabs daily at most and gain 20lbs per cycle not stacked with anything. I feel that much of this is a mental effect, where they felt that the drugs were so powerful and dangerous that they would train very hard, eat like crazy, and take very, very long breaks between cycles so that each cycle was almost like a first cycle. Even if the old drugs were more potent on a mg basis, guys are using so much more now that it wouldn't matter. Here is my friends cycle which he would do once or maybe twice per year. WK--D-bol I remember him telling me that you can only stay at 4 tabs/day for one week max for health reasons. I asked if he ever stacked injectables and he told me that that was for the crazy guys who don't care about there health or for Pros. I never bothered to tell him that I was currently on 1g/wk of sust, 8 thais/day, and a 50mg shot of winny daily, he would've told me I'll be dead soon. IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
|
|