GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
George Spellwin's ELITE FITNESS Discussion Boards
Anabolic Discussion Board Opinion poll
|
Author | Topic: Opinion poll |
IndyMan2 Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 15) |
posted June 14, 2000 03:28 PM
Easy question: If you had your chioce between Russian Sustanon (CYCTAHOH made by Infar in India) or Omnadren 250 by Jelfa (poland) which would you choose and why. Is one better than the other? Side effects? All opinions welcome and thanks. IP: Logged |
coolhandluke Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 745) |
posted June 14, 2000 03:55 PM
they are indentical. buy the cheaper of the two. IP: Logged |
300 kleen Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 2015) |
posted June 14, 2000 04:08 PM
I agree with Luke. I would go with Omna because it is most likely cheaper and it will yeild the same results. ------------------ IP: Logged |
Hercules Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 31) |
posted June 14, 2000 05:19 PM
I disagree. I think that the sustanon would give better results and less water retention. Also you would probably look leaner off the sust. if you diet properly when on it. I have seen people do both and look a lot better of the sus. Just my 2 cents!! IP: Logged |
big_guy1 Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 897) |
posted June 14, 2000 05:22 PM
ilike omna better personally big-guy IP: Logged |
IndyMan2 Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 15) |
posted June 14, 2000 07:03 PM
Thanks Bros, Ive asked this question to many other guys and I seem to get the same reply...that the Omna is identical to the Sus and yes...cheaper. SE seem to be about the same for both as well. Thanks for your input. IP: Logged |
The Ranger Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 1101) |
posted June 14, 2000 09:30 PM
Only wish I knew someone who sold the new Jelfa Omandren 250.....Heh heh heh.... Ranger IP: Logged |
bloatboy35 Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 40) |
posted June 14, 2000 10:56 PM
i'd go with the omna's, cheaper. IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | |