GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Enlightening Men about Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding for over Two Decades
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
 George Spellwin's ELITE FITNESS Discussion Boards
 Anabolic Discussion Board
 Will i get better results with t-200 or primotesten?????????????
|
| Author | Topic: Will i get better results with t-200 or primotesten????????????? |
|
Mr Texas Guns Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 44) |
posted June 13, 2000 03:38 PM
  
Guys this is my problem i used sust with eq and ref-b and lost all my gains i took my clomid like i was supposed to the first cycle i used t-200 and deca and d-bol and kept all my gains so should i go with the t-200 or primotesten thanks alot Mr Tex Guns..... IP: Logged |
|
Thick dog Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 526) |
posted June 13, 2000 03:41 PM
One advantage of the primotestins is that they are 250mg as opposed to 200mg in th T-200, if I am not mistaken. Bump IP: Logged |
|
D007 Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 298) |
posted June 13, 2000 03:45 PM
I think they are probably the same quality so i would choose the cheaper one, probably the 200. IP: Logged |
|
E2 Moderator (Total posts: 3433) |
posted June 13, 2000 03:48 PM
Primoteston and no they aren't the same quality, the primoteston is much better!!! FOrget the t200. IP: Logged |
|
decibel Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 181) |
posted June 13, 2000 03:50 PM
primoteston is intended for human use; t200 is not. it is also more concentrated (250mg); t200's are very likely to be underdosed. plus, the primoteston ampules are cool as shit!! i love breaking them open - it makes shooting up a very pleasurable experience!! but yes, they cost more, so you decide. IP: Logged |
|
Mr. Laredo Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 138) |
posted June 13, 2000 03:51 PM
Go with the primoteston by Schering. My Brovel t200 tested out at 168mg/ml. IP: Logged |
|
TAPOUT Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 19) |
posted June 13, 2000 03:52 PM
Primoteston is cleaner and it is not under dosed like T200 can be. I would go with the Primoteston, its worth a little extra cash. IP: Logged |
|
D007 Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 298) |
posted June 13, 2000 03:54 PM
CID may be better quality but I doubt there is a lot of difference between the scherring and brovel. IP: Logged |
|
lexicon Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 224) |
posted June 13, 2000 03:57 PM
Primo is way better. I don't think I'd use T200 unless it was free, and I still would be hesitent. IP: Logged |
|
media Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 11) |
posted June 14, 2000 06:53 AM
PRIMOTESTEN. No doubt. Never underdosed. 250 test VS 200 so, less oil in your ass. Lift hard, and take no prisoners! IP: Logged |
|
ThePitbull Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 169) |
posted June 14, 2000 09:41 AM
Hey Laredo or anyone else who knows, when was your t-200 tested? Was it the old style (raised lettering on stopper) or the new stuff (blue cap w/flip off on it)I have the new stuff and is part of my next cycle so I'm curious if I have to adjust the dosage. Lot # & exp. if possible? Thanks IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
|
|
