UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
George Spellwin's ELITE FITNESS Discussion Boards
Anabolic Discussion Board Test. is Test.??
|
Author | Topic: Test. is Test.?? |
Karate guy Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 239) |
posted May 09, 2000 08:49 AM
I know I read posts before that said test is test, but the shape of each steroid hormone is subtly different because different side groups are attached at the various sites on the four rings. So these subtle differences do allow for a large variety of functions. Otherwise, why not just everytbody do cypionate all the time? Or d-bol all the time? IP: Logged |
conan69 Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 753) |
posted May 09, 2000 08:57 AM
if you are talking about different types of test "test is test" no that is not right 2) test suspension (water based) is said to be the hardest of the tests because it will blow you up real quick. huge strength and weight gians, largest about of sides. You also lose the most when done. most inject ED or EOD 3)test propionate is very quick acting this is often one test that can be used during a competition cycle do to the low level or water retention and again this is injected ED or EOD due to its short half life those are the main 4 test that you will use other than sust or omna which is a 4 easter mix so no "test is NOT test" ------------------ IP: Logged |
zarathustra Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 31) |
posted May 09, 2000 09:06 AM
Hey bro...it seems like you've done some research but you're making it way more complicated than it needs to be. There are differences between the many iterations of male hormones such as adrogen/anabolic ratio. However the main difference is how they are released into the body, which determines how long they stay active. This is where the esters come in. Macro posted some good info on esters and esterfication (sp). He explains it way better than I can. Just do a search on esters and you'll find it. -Z IP: Logged |
lexicon Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 109) |
posted May 09, 2000 09:17 AM
Also, as far as all tests being the same there is also another factor. The "Quality" of each can vary greatly. I have always felt that the cheaper versions of Test cause more bad sides (acne,infection,etc) than the more $$ forms. I am not sure if the internal effects are also different but would think so. This is not to say that T200 and some others are no good as that is not true. Do youthink there may be a correlation between quality products giving more quality gains or is this way off? IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | |