UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
George Spellwin's ELITE FITNESS Discussion Boards
Anabolic Discussion Board really misinformed
|
Author | Topic: really misinformed |
supreme Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 5) |
posted May 06, 2000 03:10 AM
I just read a reply by the fitness chick to some poor newbie; talk about misinformed! nor products; juice or pro-h products do not raise testosterone. 19 nor products are missing a carbon group at the 19h podsition on the A ring. hence nor = not testosterone. The 17-beta hydroxy steroid dehydrogenase enzyme (or 3-BHD) in the liver converts nor prohormones to nor testosterone. (juice is already nor-testosteone)The fitness bimbo would know this if she ever read a biochemistry text ( can she spell biochemistry??) This change in the molecule prevents direct aromatization to estrogen although other nor metabolities can under go an organic cascade effect and be converted to estrogen nor products also convert to DHN, not DHT. Anti-aromatases won't help since the aromatase enzyme is not involved, but a REAL anti-estrogen can help (think Clomid) The best pro-h nor products are the BHP cyclodextrins by ergo-pharm, but you need 300 + mg/day also nor products can lower endogenous T so watch the cycle length and time of day. Stick to the diols and avoid diones! Good luck! if you make good gains post the stack and the results. Supreme (brains; brawn and a warped sense of humor!) IP: Logged |
WCP Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 760) |
posted May 06, 2000 03:33 AM
Hey Bro..she did what she thought was right..and your on the $ too...but I would go at least 1 gram on that.. You cant flame people for trying to help...fitness chick has proven she knows alot of whats going on....but you do have an informative post. Later, ------------------ IP: Logged |
supreme Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 5) |
posted May 06, 2000 04:09 AM
A gram a day would give better results; but you would definately run the risk of lowering your T and getting gyno. Also it woud not be cost effective; Deca is much cheaper and you don't have to worry if you have high levels of 3-BHD in your liver. At a gram a day I would definately be taking 50-100mg of Clomid it would keep my boys pumping out T and block gyno. Stay away from Tamoxifen, it screws Igf-1 production. Later! Supreme "If my grandmother had wheels, she would be a wagon" - Montgomery Scott IP: Logged |
ozzymandius Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 336) |
posted May 06, 2000 04:20 AM
But not everyone can get Deca.. IP: Logged |
macrophage69alpha Moderator (Total posts: 1324) |
posted May 06, 2000 05:43 AM
your intellectual insight is shocking however you made some fatal errors in your commentary. 1. nandrolone is converted to di-hydro-nandralone via the activity of 5a reductase, the same enzyme that reduces testosterone to dht. 2. nandrolone and its metabolites do not convert to estrogen-EVER. the so called "estrogenic" effects of nandrolone are a result of nandrolones ability to bind and activate progesterone receptors. 3. anti-estorgen will have little or no effect on nandrolone's progestenic activity. 4. it is very astute of you to repeat something that you read in magazine, however the person who wrote whatever article you are basing your facts on was mistaken as well. 5. last, but no least, beta-cyclodextrin technology is very interesting but the because of differing isomers many products are less effective than they claim to be- even then they are limited by your body's abilty to produce the two dehydrogenase enzymes neccesarry to convert them. it is unclear whether the -diols are even converted- it has been surmised that they exert a direct anabolic effect without conversion. judge not lest ye be judged, ------------------ IP: Logged |
bignate73 Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 422) |
posted May 06, 2000 06:57 AM
see? you had to wake him up.... start talking biochemistry and macro wakes up. j/k. interesting round robin here. i like these kinds of posts, way better than how i got my "handle". lets keep some good stuff like this going. IP: Logged |
the truth Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 503) |
posted May 06, 2000 08:40 AM
While nandrolone and its metabolites may not convert to estrogen, nandrolone can act as an intermediary in facilitating the conversion of endogenous androgens to estrogen. Androgen and 19-norsteroid profiles in human preovulatory follicles from stimulated cycles; an isotope dilution--mass specrometric study. This probably poses no practical problems for BBers; if it did, I'm sure a lot of us would have noticed by now. IP: Logged |
Ice Man Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 225) |
posted May 06, 2000 09:48 AM
It's like watching hard core, tennis. Back, Forth, Back, Forth.... Good thread! IP: Logged |
aten8 Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 156) |
posted May 06, 2000 09:57 AM
Macrophage69alpha is correct. By the way for someone who is a newbie I don't think you should be flaming anyone never mine fitneschick, she is respected on this board. Oh yeah copying articles out of a book doesn't always mean your right. IP: Logged |
supreme Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 5) |
posted May 06, 2000 12:37 PM
O.K lets do this quick, I want to get to the gym. 1 I never said that 5a reductase dose't convert nor-test to DHN- I just said they don't become DHT 2 It could be that the text and my colleagues are outdated about nandrolone metabolite conversion. I'll stop at the library and re-check my info. 3 You are correct about the progestin conversion; I just didn't mention it and I should have. 4 I don't really read magazines, science journals and texts yes.(one exception- Sports illustrated) 5. It is true that diols probably do not undergo conversion and are anabolic on their own- but no one is 100% sure 6. anti-estrogens won't effect progesterone receptors, but clomid will stiumalate the pituitary and increase LH to help keep T levels up 7. Just because I haven't been here for a while dosen't mean I'm a newbie. I was here long ago, before moderators, back when the board would always crash and most threads were inane flames between people whose parents must have been siblings. Not sure if I'll stay this time
IP: Logged |
Sittin' On Diesel Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 352) |
posted May 06, 2000 04:39 PM
Battle of the scientists! haha- funny stuff. IP: Logged |
MattTheSkywalker Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 626) |
posted May 06, 2000 04:56 PM
Supreme, I (and probably most readers on the board) appreciate the your input as much as we appreciate Macro's responses. However, if FitnessChick was wrong, you can say that without flaming her. Anyway I hope you do post more on the board.....just because someone disagress with you doesn't mean you should stop sharing your knowledge. Later Matt IP: Logged |
The Ranger Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 822) |
posted May 06, 2000 05:03 PM
Macro....you are without a doubt, one scary mutherfucker.....your "twin" has to be much worse....heh heh heh.....you can go back to the GHB sleep now....My Iron Brutha.......Peace...!! Ranger IP: Logged |
Jay Z Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 170) |
posted May 06, 2000 05:13 PM
Who cares about prohormones anyway???? ------------------ IP: Logged |
FitnessChick Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 164) |
posted May 06, 2000 06:28 PM
....i gave what info i had....can you blame me for trying...sorry if i was a little off,,,95 percent of the time I think i am on the $... IP: Logged |
FitnessChick Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 164) |
posted May 06, 2000 06:55 PM
PS SUPREME.....FYI I am not a bimbo....if you look at my posts & actually read them, you would realize I have quite a brain which I put to very good use....I won't stoop to your levels of name calling...you could have corrected my misinfo without that....but hey, I guess you need to flame me...oh well, can't win em all, right? IP: Logged |
bignate73 Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 422) |
posted May 06, 2000 07:23 PM
i think the point could have been made without resorting to flaming. if it bothers you that someone is talking about a subject and if in fact they are wrong, the correct info is the biggest flame there is. all in all, unnecessary to resort to name calling, especially ones derogatory of women. we have trouble keeping women on this board because some of the bros have issues with women knowing their shit. put the ego aside and just read the words in that case. there is no gender to black letters and white background. my $.02 on this at least. oh and please dont wake macrophage69alpha. its the weekend and he makes me think dammit. weekends are not for thinking. hehe. peace! ------------------ IP: Logged |
TxCollegeguy Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 279) |
posted May 06, 2000 07:58 PM
Good thread but once again it looks like someone has to Bitch about flamming...I thought we went through this a few weeks back....There is nothing wrong with flamming it's something that everyone should expect on the board. I think some of the newbies here need to read up some more of the archives to see what real Flamming is....Fitness Chick and everyone else, We are all thankfull for the info you bring to the board....As long as you give your best input then Hey It's all good. Thats all anyone can ask of you. Keep posting what you know to be true, and if someone else can shed some light on points we miss then more power to us all.
IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | |