GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Enlightening Men about Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding for over Two Decades
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
 George Spellwin's ELITE FITNESS Discussion Boards
 Anabolic Discussion Board
 Any point in doing a 4 week cycle?
|
| Author | Topic: Any point in doing a 4 week cycle? |
|
somec- Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 45) |
posted May 01, 2000 11:50 AM
  
I just received some Sust/Deca that I was planning to use on my first cycle mid-June. The reason for mid-June is that I am taking a week beach vacation in early June. Any point in doing a mini-cycle now to get a little more ripped before hitting the beach, or should I just wait and do a full cycle upon returning from vacation? My hotel will have a "fitness facility" but I don't know that I really want to rely on an unknown gym for a week in the middle of a cycle. Any tips? IP: Logged |
|
somec- Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 45) |
posted May 01, 2000 12:04 PM
To clarify, the hotel's "fitness facility" would only be used if for some reason I decided to start a full 8-week cycle now and continue it through my vacation, which I wouldn't prefer. IP: Logged |
|
Power Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 93) |
posted May 01, 2000 01:30 PM
Personally- I'd wait and cycle after the trip. Since I only cycle 3 times per year- I like to make the most of mine. Just my personal opinion. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
300 kleen Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 877) |
posted May 01, 2000 01:40 PM
The Old "Short cycle vs. Long cycle". If you do a short cycle you will only gain about 5-10 pounds, but will you have to go heavy on the gear. The reasoning behind short cycles is that you will keep the 5-10 pounds when you stop because you don't give your body a chance to down regulate its endogenous test production. Plus, side effects are lowered significantly. And, cycles can be started again shortly there after. Ironically, in the long run it equals the same amount of weight that one would gain doing long cycles, but no one wants to hear that. The answer to your questions depends on what you want out of the cycle. 300 kleen IP: Logged |
|
tray renfro Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 462) |
posted May 01, 2000 02:00 PM
nicely said 300, to me there is no difference except shorter cycles i believe are easier to handle. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
somec- Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 45) |
posted May 01, 2000 02:12 PM
300...what would you suggest for a "heavy on the gear" cycle compared to the 8 week cycle I have planned of approx 500sus/300deca per week? IP: Logged |
|
InstantGrowth Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 25) |
posted May 01, 2000 03:46 PM
I am going to try a short cycle starting in June, except I will be on AS for one month and GH on the next and will do this for about 4-6 months dependig on how much GH I get. I hope I can put on about 30lbs. in these 6 months. Can't wait. InstantGrowth IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
|
|