GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Enlightening Men about Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding for over Two Decades
| Author | Topic: EAS vs. Muscle tech!!! | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder 
Posts: 96 |
Which, in general, do you like? opinions? If you had a choice would you get cell-tech "which cost more" or phosphagen HP?     | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 114 |
I quit wasting my money a long time ago | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 96 |
What do take for a supplement, stups? more input...please | ||
|
Novice 
Posts: 6 |
cell tech has 10 grams of creatine per serv and 75 grams of carbs.phosphagen hp has 5grams of creatine and only 35 grams of dextrose.That is why you get twice the servings out of the eas.But it is only half as strong.Ive personally used both and even when i drink twice the eas i still gain more weight and stregnth with cell tech | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 97 |
I tried the new Eas syntevol creatine and then cell-tech. Cell-tech worked way mo better for me. | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 140 |
As far as these 2 products are concerned, I would chose cell-tech, just based on past experience. As far as the other prdoucts are concerned I would chose EAS. Although I am a bit embarrased to say that. | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 159 |
I dont know if those 10 page cell-tech ads have brain washed me, but it seems to work better! | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 96 |
cell-tech has 10g of creatine. Doesn't anyone think it's a waste. I read that the body only uses 5g or so. I bring up this question because I'm trying to find some way to stop my shrinking. Been off cycle for a month and boy I'm going down hill. what's wierd is my energy is near zero. | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 138 |
I won't buy Muscletech products because I don't want to pay for their bullsh*t ads. As for E.A.S., I would just as soon rot in hell as support a sell out. I have used products that had the same formula as Cell-Tech and it worked well as far as creatine goes. Just don't buy the Muscletech brand, you can get the same stuff a lot cheaper from a different label. | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 87 |
I have personally been using Muscletech for some time now, and am happy with the results. Beware of what Bigkraut said though. A lot of stuff is cheaper out there, but it's usually for a reason. I have read many times about smaller companies that don't meet label claims. Stick with the big names. ------------------ | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 87 |
I'm not saying you use no name stuff Big, but I just don't want bro here to get the wrong idea.  ------------------ | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 138 |
You called it right, Bad, me be one cheap ass mofo! lol. | ||
|
Pro Bodybuilder 
Posts: 526 |
EAS makes the best Sustanon  | ||
|
Cool Novice 
Posts: 25 |
EAS Way better the muscle crap i have read every lab report and done independent lab reports at school and Muscle crap stuff sucks way under claims all it is is a carb suger load | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 84 |
Deca: Feels like Deca! I can't wait until EAS comes out with their own Deca. Although with their marketing, it would probably be something like this: Deca, feels just like HMB! But as soon as they do come out with their own deca, I will..., no, not even then will I waste my money on them. | ||
|
Novice
Posts: 3 |
EAS.......but why spend hundreds to get,,,,,something if at all, when you can go with the real deal for cheaper? | ||
|
Pro Bodybuilder
Posts: 300 |
cell tech's good, but i'd rather buy some propionate instead | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 96 |
I know! the gear is best but we need to fuel gear. ya know what i mean. Don't you guys love the way musclemag talks about muscle tech. I hate musclemag's supplement info. It's all super-bi. |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
|
|
posted April 22, 2001 05:21 PM