GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Enlightening Men about Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding for over Two Decades
|
 Elite Fitness Bodybuilding, Anabolics, Diet, Life Extension, Wellness, Supplements, and Training Boards
 Anabolic Discussion Board
 Which is the better EQ cycle?
|
| Author | Topic: Which is the better EQ cycle? | ||
|
Cool Novice 
Posts: 31 |
which one would be better for mass gains? WEEK 1...600mg OR WEEK 1-14 @400mg straight through? for the first one, if i hit the receptors hard at first - then would that make any difference compared to the other one? thanks     | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder 
Posts: 238 |
400 straight through. | ||
|
Cool Novice
Posts: 31 |
how come the 400mg straight through would be better? if i went that route, then do i do a - 1cc injection twice a week, or just 2cc once a week? | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 96 |
Bump, I also would like to know why 400mg straight through would be better. You would get more mgs out of the first one????? | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 257 |
400 | ||
|
Elite Bodybuilder 
Posts: 631 |
I seem to agree with 400mg straight through but don't know the technical way to explain it. So for what I think is a good question. BUMP!! | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 212 |
I will play the devils advocate here in a debating kind of manner....just for thoughts... Undec. is quite possibly the longest acting ester chain in the AS world...SO, by hitting the recepters hard, with higher dosages, and taper slightly...would the affinity of the recepters retain more of the active ester,creating a more positive nitrogen balance, thereby giving way for better gains??? Just a thought..... BZR | ||
|
Elite Bodybuilder
Posts: 831 |
I am with bruzer on this one. I'm about to run aratest & eq, and I'll be shooting 600mg of the eq for the first week. Then I'll drop to 400mg for the final 11 weeks. Some may think it's a waste of time, but it makes sense to me. ------------------ [This message has been edited by 'ORCHITIS' (edited April 04, 2001).] | ||
|
Elite Bodybuilder
Posts: 853 |
I get better results starting big. | ||
|
Cool Novice
Posts: 31 |
thanks everyone for your opinions. i am interested in hearing some more of BRUZER's theory. i remember reading something by Duchaine a while back, that said you should hit the receptors hard at first(which i guess may send it into instant growth?)i don't know. if anyone else has tried this method, let us know if it made a difference or not. |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
|
|
posted April 03, 2001 10:53 PM