GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Enlightening Men about Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding for over Two Decades
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
 George Spellwin's ELITE FITNESS Discussion Boards
 Anabolic Discussion Board
 nor200 vs. decanandrolen200
|
| Author | Topic: nor200 vs. decanandrolen200 |
|
bg1979 Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 62) |
posted April 23, 2000 06:11 PM
  
how much better is the aussie? IP: Logged |
|
foadman Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 45) |
posted April 24, 2000 10:32 AM
bump IP: Logged |
|
die_hard842 Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 344) |
posted April 24, 2000 11:39 AM
Dude the Denkall Deca is bye far much better than Brovel Labs shit. yes it does cost more but I would rather pay for quality gear then put shit in my ass, like a dumd ass I did some Brovel shit last week because I ran out of My Aussie Gear now I have a lump in my ass the size of a golf ball that i will have to have cut out. IP: Logged |
|
E2 Moderator (Total posts: 2570) |
posted April 24, 2000 11:47 AM
DIE HARD IS 100% RIGHT, PAY MORE AND GET QUALITY. THE BROVEL STUFF IS ALL CRAP IN MY EYES I WILL NEVER STICK THIER SHIT IN ME. NEVER!!! I CARE ABOUT MY BODY TO MUCH IP: Logged |
|
wraithman69 Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 57) |
posted April 24, 2000 12:47 PM
I dont agree with you guys, I have used large amounts of brovel t200/nor200 without any problems whatsoever. Im not saying its great stuff, but it does work. If you can get the aussie stuff take that instead, but dont be afraid of Brovel. IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
|
|
