GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Enlightening Men about Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding for over Two Decades
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
 George Spellwin's ELITE FITNESS Discussion Boards
 Anabolic Discussion Board
 Primo vs Deca. Perm Gains
|
| Author | Topic: Primo vs Deca. Perm Gains |
|
AllPLAYA Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 5) |
posted April 11, 2000 01:46 PM
 
I would like to know which is better for keeping gains on after the cycle is done- Deca (Norandren 50) or Primbolan Depot. I don't really care which one puts on the most size while on the cycle. Any help with a moderate cycle for each would be appreciated. As far as money is concerned I know primo cost more but from what I have read it has the least amount of side affects and that is worth all the $$ in the world to me. Would I need any anti-estrogen drugs when finishing a light-moderate cycle of either. I know I will get responses that a moderate cycle of deca or primo is not worth shit but I am not after enormous gains. Just better than natural (as safe as it gets.) How can I factor clenbuterol into the cycle. I am a novice just looking for 5-10 pounds of muscle in 6-8 weeks while burning away as much fat as possible. Thank You IP: Logged |
|
Gigante' Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 10) |
posted April 11, 2000 01:54 PM
primo @ 400 a week. IMO better "quality" gains - harder muscle, less sides. Clomid EOD and Nolva on stand - by. Deca has too many sides - i'll never do it again by itself. Deca dick isn't funny. IP: Logged |
|
demaroid Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 105) |
posted April 12, 2000 11:33 AM
Deca having too many sides? IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
|
|