Elite Fitness Bodybuilding, Anabolics, Diet, Life Extension, Wellness, Supplements, and Training Boards
Anabolic Discussion Board anabol
|
Author | Topic: anabol | ||
Pro Bodybuilder Posts: 305 |
this might be a stupid question but what the hell........is there a difference between methandienone and methandrostenolone, and if so which is better? ive bought both before and one seems to give better gains(methandrostenolone). ------------------ | ||
Elite Bodybuilder Posts: 942 |
well the quality of the d-bol could play a big role...anabol is great......later ------------------ | ||
Pro Bodybuilder Posts: 305 |
ultra so there is no chemical difference? ------------------ | ||
Pro Bodybuilder Posts: 593 |
There is no difference...I asked this exact same question after I read a post by some guy saying the manufacturer of Russian Dbol had changed the chemical from methandrostenolone to methandienone (or vice versa), and claiming these Russian D's were "more powerful"...He was wrong though- the compounds are the same. | ||
Amateur Bodybuilder Posts: 76 |
I've done russians once and thais once. The russians gave me better strengh gains, the thias were better for size. I was thinking this was becuase they had different chemical names and thus, were somewhat different. It could have just been how my body reacted to the compound at each given time. That is I might have gained more strengh on russians and tried the russians again only to find better size gains. I would need to try them both again at least once more to see if the preceived effects are consistant. Russians were way harsher though. | ||
Pro Bodybuilder Posts: 593 |
Maybe your russian D's were methyltest? | ||
Elite Bodybuilder Posts: 648 |
thats what I hear!! Thais are awesome, so are Naps. I can feel naps best.Good stuff! | ||
Pro Bodybuilder Posts: 305 |
thanks for the input bros, i appreciate it.this also clears up the chemical question for me . thanks! ------------------ |
All times are ET (US) | |