GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Enlightening Men about Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding for over Two Decades
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
 George Spellwin's ELITE FITNESS Discussion Boards
 Anabolic Discussion Board
 Some interesting cycle ideas -- What do you think??
|
| Author | Topic: Some interesting cycle ideas -- What do you think?? |
|
CalKid Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 13) |
posted March 09, 2000 05:52 PM
  
I'm sure nearly everyone here has tried and done the traditional 6 to 10 week cycle. But has anyone ever experimented with a much shorter cycle such as 2 or 3 weeks only? Hey, no flames yet... let me explain. If you use fast acting steroids (such as dbol, test prop, etc.), you can complete a 2 week cycle before you ever shut down your natural test production. Thus, you never have to worry about the rebound while waiting for your natural test production to kick into high gear after your cycle. So instead of gaining 20 lbs in a 8 week cycle, taking a few months off and losing 8 of the pounds, then bulking up with another 8 week cycle later, what about more consistency? With shorter cycles you can gain 5 to 8 lbs (more or less I believe), take a few weeks off, and do it again. Some might argue that it takes 4 or 5 weeks to really get gains during a typical cycle. I would argue that's not the case if you use high amounts of fast acting drugs. An example of this might be as follows (never tried, but am seriously contemplating): day 1 = 1 gram t200 w/ 100-200mg of test prop, every other day thereafter = 200mg of test prop with a final taper of only 50mg test prop on the final day of the second week. For all the crazy types out there, feel free to add your dbols and abombs. Hit the clomid hard for a week or two after, take a few more weeks off, then repeat. Now, keeping an open mind, what do you pros out there think of this? I think it will minimize side effects, allow more consistent gains, and be more healthy for the long haul. All input is appreciated... IP: Logged |
|
2Thick Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 621) |
posted March 09, 2000 06:18 PM
I feel that it will be the same in the end. Especially since you will be doing more cycles in a shorter time span. I prefer 6-week cycles. Three weeks with high dosages would shock my system too much. Jon ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
onlythestrong Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 21) |
posted March 09, 2000 06:36 PM
I did a 4 wk cycle of sus at moderate doses when I started and kept on a solid 11 lbs. The problem with the short cycle is that your body still possibly down regulates the receptors each time you use the gear. You might not affect natural test levels, but each time you will need to up the dose to get good results. Thats why people go in for the long haul, the receptors will down regulate, but the cycle will have good effects. One plus to your way is that people wouldnt really be able to see an instant difference in your size, but over time it will accumulate. IP: Logged |
|
CalKid Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 13) |
posted March 09, 2000 08:23 PM
BUMP! Any more thoughts?? IP: Logged |
|
BigPapaPump Moderator (Total posts: 143) |
posted March 09, 2000 11:00 PM
I've tried the short cycles and have had mixed results. SUst seems to give me the best results when added with dbol or a50's. I use 150 mg of prop every 3 days for 1 week then keep a constant 50 mg/day of dbol with 500 to 750mg of sust for 5 weeks. Usually I wouldn't even require the clomid. I can't say that I've really had good results with eth or cyp. The shitty results could have been caused by something else that I did wrong. Give it a try and let us know. BPP IP: Logged |
|
spoon Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 2) |
posted March 10, 2000 11:36 AM
BUMP! IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
|
|
Powered by:
Ultimate Bulletin Board (UltimateBB), Version 5.42a
� Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998-1999.