GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Enlightening Men about Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding for over Two Decades
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
 George Spellwin's ELITE FITNESS Discussion Boards
 Anabolic Discussion Board
 Anti-estrogenz VS estrogen blockers
|
| Author | Topic: Anti-estrogenz VS estrogen blockers |
|
ozzymandius Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 116) |
posted March 07, 2000 08:22 PM
  
Which do you guyz think is better as far as stopping gyno and not inhibiting gainz. thanx IP: Logged |
|
E2 Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 1199) |
posted March 07, 2000 10:50 PM
Ok what do you mean? which is better and antiaromatase or something that competes with receptor site? I'd say the competition, most anitaromatases will cut into your gain, but i'm still trying to figure that one out. I dont know if proviron will really cut into your gains. IP: Logged |
|
Joseph_stalin Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 214) |
posted March 08, 2000 02:36 PM
why not combine clomid and arimidex. IP: Logged |
|
Phreaky Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 3) |
posted March 08, 2000 03:08 PM
A combination of clomid and proviron seems to work the best. This stack does not seem to inhibit muscluar gains what so ever. It may, however, reduce water retention and contribute to an overall reduction of weight gain. Arimidex should only be used with 1g+/week of test. Teslac is far too expensive to justify use. Nolvadex has moderate effectiveness and has shown in some studies to decrease IGF conversion. Hope this helps! IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
|
|
Powered by:
Ultimate Bulletin Board (UltimateBB), Version 5.42a
� Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998-1999.
