posted February 08, 2000 12:11 AM         

---

Why is it steroids are supposed to be intramuscular injections? Are subcutaneous injections less effective? How/why? I know this is a lot of questions, but any input would be appreciated! I ask because i hate intramuscular injections; they hurt like a SOB. Also, if anyone here has used finny, what is the preferred method: dmso or forming into injectable solution? Thanks in Advance.

IP: Logged

posted February 08, 2000 12:26 AM           

---

For the Finny, DMSO. Assuming you can handle smelling like a wet dog that eats garlic.

AS's are best used intramuscular because it allows the body to process it slower and more eefciently. Just dumping into the bloodstream means the body uses what it can right then and there and the rest just gets washed out.

I'm pretty sure thats the flow of everything I've read without going too deeply into it.

IP: Logged

posted February 08, 2000 12:54 AM         

---

By subcutaneous I meant into fat, not muscle..like when you pinch some skin and inject there-they dont hurt at all. Doesnt the fat hold it in equally as well as muscle?

IP: Logged

posted February 08, 2000 04:54 AM         

---

Bump!

I would like to know too

IP: Logged

posted February 08, 2000 05:09 AM            

---

by finny I assume you mean fina...I would make an injecatble, more effetive then dmso in my opiniion...get a kit and make it an injecatble...

IP: Logged

posted February 08, 2000 08:23 AM            

---

Ok first, most AS's are oil based, if you inject them into fat you will not get the proper absorption that you need because it is going to stay in the fat at varying rates. You want to inject into muscle because you will get a slow, and the key word here is steady, rate of absorption into your bloodstream. Your body will dump all the unused steroid right out. I say suck it up and if you don't like deep IM injections stick with the orals and blow out your liver.

Platinum

IP: Logged

posted February 08, 2000 12:28 PM            

---

Shit, you mean you guy's have fat to inject into ? you guy's better get on the spacial K diet and pinch an inch

IP: Logged

posted February 08, 2000 10:54 PM         

---

Big_guy1: Injectable form does get more of the actual trenbolone in(100% actually)-but the problem with the "kit" is that you're also injecting methanol into your body; not good. There are other methods of forming into an injectable sans methanol. DMSO method is estimated to get only about 40% of it through; not including swamp gas breath, rashes... ive never used it before, but may possibly. Ive heard mixed results with DMSO, thats why im asking. The biggest con on making an injectible is keeping it %100 sterile; big health risk if its not. Anyonehere made their own injectable finny?

Adonis: LOL-I'm at 4% by hydrostatic weighing. Having fat to perform Sub-cu's to doesnt necessarily indicate obesity; otherwise ALL diabetics and TB vaccination recipeints would be obese.

IP: Logged

posted February 09, 2000 02:28 AM         

---

ttt

IP: Logged

posted February 09, 2000 06:19 AM         

---

So what about water based winny or test susp.
Can you use that subcut.?

My glutes really get hard on the winny to such an extent, that I have to hammer the needle in after a few weeks of using.

IP: Logged

posted February 09, 2000 01:14 PM         

---

Another factor to consider is the AS's half life; I would think stuff like trenbolone, which pretty much is metabolized out of blood serum in about a day would be OK to inject subcutaneously; because of that there'd really be no point in doing it in the muscle I would think. On the otherhand I would see the benefit of doing stuff like sustenon into muscle, if muscle tissue does really release it over a longer period of time. Any more opinions?

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)