GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Enlightening Men about Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding for over Two Decades
|
 Elite Fitness Bodybuilding, Anabolics, Diet, Life Extension, Wellness, Supplements, and Training Boards
 Anabolic Discussion Board
 Deca vs sustanon. Relative effectiveness.
|
| Author | Topic: Deca vs sustanon. Relative effectiveness. | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder 
Posts: 262 |
I need some opinions. From what I had read the effectiveness of 600mg/week of deca would be equivalent to about 450mg/week of sustanon. Do others here agree or am I way off the mark?     | ||
|
Pro Bodybuilder 
Posts: 300 |
There is no way of making such an equivalent. You cannot compare deca to test and you certainly cant put figures on them. | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 262 |
You can estimate from experience. Its not like I am asking for hard-core double blind case studies using 10,000 people and rigourous lab techniques. People estimate relative effectiveness of steroids all the time. If people didn't do that we wouldn't ever hear people talking about how they got faster growth from, say, anadrol vs primobolan for example. Stop being obtuse! Only constructive and helpful comments please. | ||
|
Pro Bodybuilder
Posts: 300 |
quote: Do not call me obtuse you gave a question and I thought I answered it. Do not judge me! If I took 600mgs of deca on my first cycle and 450mgs of deca on my second how can I realistically say that I grew more on my first cycle because I used something different. First cycle is always the most growth period! Some people get nothing from deca, others get nothing from test. Dont ask questions if you dont like the answers! You are rude [This message has been edited by Solid Steel (edited February 25, 2001).] | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 262 |
Solid steel, well I think you can compare the relative strength of steroids otherwise I wouldn't have placed the post. You're patronising attitude implying it was a silly question wasn't at all helpful. Plenty of people weigh up the relative effectiveness of steroids all the time. It is a perfectly legitimate question. This is an art more than a science, so that is why I am asking for helpful opinions. Don't you ever reply to any of my posts again. | ||
|
Cool Novice 
Posts: 31 |
HEY,IF YOU WANT THE BEST EFFECT STACK'M !!! | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 261 |
He is right, you really can't compare them. The high does needed of deca, to mathc the androgenic effect of sus will come with some health risks, and nasty side effects. Combine them for best results. Thats the whole purpose of stacking, you don't need to up the dose on individual drugs. To tell you the truth, I don't like deca. It has a lot popularity, but I think that it is crap. Why the hell would somebody want to take a female hormone... Anyways, that topic is for another discussion. From what I heard, Deca by itself is not very effective, or at least lasting. Sus or any test by itself is effective and you can keep your gains. | ||
|
Novice 
Posts: 10 |
Your ratio of 4 parts deca to 3 parts sustanon seems about right in my experience. The sustanon is definitely a stronger compound mg for mg. | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 204 |
I do like deca very much. It is a good compound but i do beleive the test would be more potent mg for mg if that's what you mean. YES STACK EM they are a great combo | ||
|
Pro Bodybuilder
Posts: 300 |
Lizzy you are far more arrogant than I had expected! Have you ever heard of the Anabolic Androgen ratio? If so you would not have to post this question, not to mention the binding affinity of both. Dont worry I wont be replying to your posts anymore. I wont waste my time! I tried helping you and you accuse me of being 'obtuse'. Now piss off and have a good day. | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 252 |
LIZZY, ARE YOU FEMALE? NOT SURE WITH THE NAME. THAT WOULD HELP US OUT A BIT. MOST CHICKS DIG DECCA. ------------------ |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
|
|
posted February 25, 2001 08:15 AM