GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Enlightening Men about Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding for over Two Decades
|
 Elite Fitness Bodybuilding, Anabolics, Diet, Life Extension, Wellness, Supplements, and Training Boards
 Anabolic Discussion Board
 is fina better then sust or what?
|
| Author | Topic: is fina better then sust or what? | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder 
Posts: 93 |
?????    | ||
|
Elite Bodybuilder 
Posts: 1463 |
Apples and Oranges.....  | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 142 |
well I would say they are both about equal, and I say this because fina works right away so does sustanon to an extent, but sustanon is better when you talk about time length since its halflife is longer than fina, but the best thing to do is take them together. | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 56 |
this question cant be answered,,, be more specific... which is better for strength? which is better for size? which is better for precontest? the drugs are completely different what are your goals? | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 93 |
go on! | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder
Posts: 93 |
no ,no just curious about the fina- already taking sust/deca= read a post earlier about guy doing 5 wks of sust then ending with the fina and just wondered why not finish the sust all the way through?just hearing alot of hype about fina thought of considering it in a future cycle. doing abombs, test and eq next cycle then in summer will be doing a cutting cycle - where could i throw it in? | ||
|
Pro Bodybuilder 
Posts: 572 |
Fina is 3 times more anabolic than test, so it will leave you with more muscle than the Sust, but it's considered a cutting drug since it doesn't cause water retention. |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
|
|
posted December 31, 2000 10:15 PM