A lot of people on this site are constantly telling people SARMs are safe without any official human trials being done with them. Very rarely on this site and others do anyone talk about any potential issues from SARMs, they just tell people they are safe. Not a single SARM is FDA approved and nobody really knows what the long term effects of SARMs at what dosages can lead to down the road.
Can you show me the actual human trials that prove LDG or RAD140 are any less repressive to testosterone than Anavar or any other steroid?
Finn beat me to a lot of it and to expound on a few things...
1. you conveniently changed it up now and it went from that noone mentioned to suppression to now that noone says there are side effects... which clearly shows you either A. have a motive B. dont' really read much and C. have tunnel vision on the topic and hear what you want to hear
2. i have over 10 years of coaching people on these, using them myself, years on forums, from reading bloodwork, to analyzing it, to seeing the effects etc... thats MORE than enough sample size, considering over that time ive seen thousands of bloodwork results on these
3. your post shows a complete lack of understanding, study, thorough examination and lack of experience with them... the suppression seen with standard dosing of lgd4033 and rad, from ALL the blood panels ive observed as well as on myself are nowhere near full blown bottomed out suppression like with steroids.. as well as the fact its the total test number that is what gets lowered and generally lh and fsh stays where it is or in some instances has increased... thats not even remotely close to a steroid.. if you dont like that or dont believe it, thats on you to think and believe... i cant control anyone's thoughts but its not factual... we dont get to pick and choose our "truths" like what seems to be popular with dip shits anymore.. thats now how it works.. you can think whatever you want but it doesnt make it a fact
I HAVE COUNTLESS POSTS, and videos that talk about the side effects associated with each sarm.. sarms like 2866 and 677 have studies back to the 90's... there is an inherent risk with anything you take and we all have different responses and reactions.. you take a risk with anything you use...
it is WELL documented that the side effects are nowhere near that of a steroid in most situations.. ive made it ABUNDANTLY clear with s23 and lgd3033 that they should be categorized as sarms and advise them , just as steroids, to not use at a younger age...
YOU DO NOT HAVE TO USE THEM IF YOU DONT LIKE THEM... NOONE is forcing you to use them and noone that i see is making false claims here.. if they are, then i would correct them quickly... NOONE makes you or anyone use or buy anything they dont want to... they are RECOMMENDATIONS and ALTERNATIVES...
unless you have that kind of experience with them, im sorry but your "opinion" is just that, an opinion, which you are certainly entitled to and noone should say otherwise, but i can flat out tell you that your assumptions are wrong...