Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

Why was Boldenone never used for human consumption throughout history?

Mavy

Super Human
Platinum
Can anyone tell me why Boldenone has never made it to the human market? I think that someone poster 1 study where it was tested on humans before, cant remember by who or why.

I dont understand? Its such a great drug in my opinion. I am thinking that it has never made it because EQ is almost identicle to d-bol. The only difference is EQ has been 17 beta esterfied while d-bol has been 17 alpha alkylated.

This small change makes the two hormones act very differently in the body, but makes dbol much more effective, maybe that is why it has never made it to the human market? No need for it because dbol will do the job better? Well EQ is NOT liver toxic at sane doses where dbol is. You would think that that would be a selling point right there.

Also, I am thinking that there are just to many other things out there, ... dbol, test, var, primo, deca, adrol, winny, and they just really do not need it. But why do they feel horses need this so much when there are all those other choices out there? I am just curious what makes this compound so great for horses, but not great enough for people that it has never been made for the human market? Any thoughts?

Mavy
 
There is no actual proof this georgie, (mind you this is probably because there are very few studies done on human consumption) And further more this is something that is more of an "urban legend" amongst bodybuilders that has passed on through time and use.
 
here's my guess...look at what most steroids are used for, hormone replacement therapy or for wasting diseases, i dont think equipose would have much use for either, it used in animals because it increases muscle endurance and slight lean muscle gains.....that could be why, no real benefit to people other than athletes looking for an edge, and steroids are not produced for that...legally atleast.
 
how come dbol aromatizes and boldenone doesn't if they are so similar?

not being a prick here, asking a serious question.
 
NJjuice22 said:
here's my guess...look at what most steroids are used for, hormone replacement therapy or for wasting diseases, i dont think equipose would have much use for either, it used in animals because it increases muscle endurance and slight lean muscle gains.....that could be why, no real benefit to people other than athletes looking for an edge, and steroids are not produced for that...legally atleast.

correct
 
NJjuice22 said:
here's my guess...look at what most steroids are used for, hormone replacement therapy or for wasting diseases, i dont think equipose would have much use for either, it used in animals because it increases muscle endurance and slight lean muscle gains.....that could be why, no real benefit to people other than athletes looking for an edge, and steroids are not produced for that...legally atleast.
but isn't deca prescribed?
 
jerkbox said:
how come dbol aromatizes and boldenone doesn't if they are so similar?

not being a prick here, asking a serious question.
bold does aromatize
 
and dbol marmotizes into a methylated estrogen which is much stronger so the small amount that amortizes has greater effects
 
Top Bottom