RodrigueZz
New member
I am currently 63" and 140 lbs with equal to or less than 10% body fat. I am hoping to get to 150 lbs while remaining under 10% body fat.
I have read a few websites and heard from people in he gym that walking is better than running for burning fat as the ratio of fat to muscle consumed as energy during walking has a higher percentage of fat than running. The only reasons why running may seem a better choice is that no endurance is built when walking, and due to a runner exerting more energy than a walker more calories are burned overall in a 30 minute running session than would be burned in a 30 minute walking session, resulting in more total fat being burned when running.
Is this true or am I misinterpreting the literature? Am I correct for thinking that long walking sessions will help me reach my goal by burning unwanted fat and helping me maintain my muscle?
I have read a few websites and heard from people in he gym that walking is better than running for burning fat as the ratio of fat to muscle consumed as energy during walking has a higher percentage of fat than running. The only reasons why running may seem a better choice is that no endurance is built when walking, and due to a runner exerting more energy than a walker more calories are burned overall in a 30 minute running session than would be burned in a 30 minute walking session, resulting in more total fat being burned when running.
Is this true or am I misinterpreting the literature? Am I correct for thinking that long walking sessions will help me reach my goal by burning unwanted fat and helping me maintain my muscle?