Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

the first time I've ever agreed with a White Aryan

strongchick

Well-known member
White Aryan Resistance *
Tom Metzger, Leader
Fallbrook, Calif.

"If the U.S. Criminal leaders had kept [their noses] out of the middle eastern feud thousands of Americans that are dead would still be alive. Intervention and international policing to protect transnational corporations, banking and Jew intrigue are the causes – disaster is the effect."


lots more quotes here:

http://www.splcenter.org/cgi-bin/goframe.pl?dirname=/intelligenceproject&pagename=ip-4t99.html

Again, I don't like the anti-Jewish slant, but the _gist_ of the message rings true to me.
 
funny to see someone who bitches about how her people are mistreated hating the jews. im sure our relations would be much better with the arabs if we had let them kill all the israelis.
 
Well sure, that part is fact strongchick, about the criminal leaders and such protecting banking/oil interests...
 
I don't hate the Jews.

I just don't see how our foreign policy has helped. Jews in Israel still die at the hands of Arabs.

In fact, I might not have my current career if it weren't for the Jews. On my list of references, 2 of the 4 are Jewish people that I adore and admire.

Aryans are full of hate...I am not.
 
what our policy there has done has delayed the inevitable. instead of one big blowout in which a ton of people would be killed in one great war we are minmizing the deaths but it will only delay it for a while. its funny how the arabs complain about how we help the jews. i wonder what the arabs would do to the jews if we hadnt helped them. probably a lot more than 5000 dead.
 
strongchick said:
White Aryan Resistance *
Tom Metzger, Leader
Fallbrook, Calif.

"If the U.S. Criminal leaders had kept [their noses] out of the middle eastern feud thousands of Americans that are dead would still be alive. Intervention and international policing to protect transnational corporations, banking and Jew intrigue are the causes – disaster is the effect."


lots more quotes here:

http://www.splcenter.org/cgi-bin/goframe.pl?dirname=/intelligenceproject&pagename=ip-4t99.html

Again, I don't like the anti-Jewish slant, but the _gist_ of the message rings true to me.

Of course the USC leaders would have the general public believe that we're some sort of moral cops, when we're not. It's protect your oil interests, which turns out to be the biggest lobbyists in DC, or campaign contributors, I'm wondering what else will show up because of this war. A lot more I bet. Staying tuned....
 
Re: Re: the first time I've ever agreed with a White Aryan

gymnpoppa said:


Of course the USC leaders would have the general public believe that we're some sort of moral cops, when we're not. It's protect your oil interests, which turns out to be the biggest lobbyists in DC, or campaign contributors, I'm wondering what else will show up because of this war. A lot more I bet. Staying tuned....

nope, i think youre the only one that believes that they are trying to make us think that.
 
Re: Re: Re: the first time I've ever agreed with a White Aryan

rushx79 said:


nope, i think youre the only one that believes that they are trying to make us think that.

No, I know they aren't, but a number of people I talk to (even on this board), think that we're there to police the region, and as far as Israel is concerned, we are. Also, the Taiwan island, which is/was a part of China, but broke away, and demands to be recognized as an independent nation, is backed by us. Why?
Why is it necessary to defend these people? That would be akin to Hawaii saying they were an independent nation, and Japan threatening to attack, sending ships, selling missile defense systems and other arms to Hawaii, and backing them. It's none of our business from a political standpoint. How can Bush honestly expect China to have any but a hostile attitude (remember the spy plane incident) towards us?

This form of meddling has not worked for us in the past, and it cultivates hatred around the world. Countries are reluctant participants in deals/situations with us because of these types of actions. Two stories coming from the same mouth. We attempt to build a world wide coalition on terrorism, yet we won't participate in a International Crime Court infrastructure to deal with the problem. That's stupid theory.

So we end of having to buy countries participation in our situations.......we did this in the M East, and look at the attitudes toward us.
 
whats wrong with protecting our oil interests? you people say that as if its a bad thing. last i checked our cars still need oil in order to get places.
 
MoneyBags said:
whats wrong with protecting our oil interests? you people say that as if its a bad thing. last i checked our cars still need oil in order to get places.

israel was not originally about oil interests......it might be useful now to have them as an ally but back when that balfour dude inventedthe idea of converting british palestine into israel, i doubt they were thinking or even predicted the cold war.

the middle easterners on the other hand resented the fact a non-muslim state was in there.

they also are still quite pissed over the supporting saddam and the shah thing plus others.

while we did protect our oil interests in their eyes and from their perspexctive we never went to war with the soviets and at then end of the day the guys we always seemed to choose to replace the soviet sympathetic (note only this way becasue the soviets gave em money) were these fucked up crackpot dictators.

its happened a lot in africa too.
 
musclebrains said:
Somebody needs to define "our oil interests." It's not OUR oil.

its our fucking money thats buying the oil. that means we have some fucking interest. its our oil interest faggot.
 
Anything the US does in other countries is because of one reason....to protect our personal freedoms. Weather that means going out for our own interests or something else, it all comes down to supporting and sustaining the the life we live day to day. Its all related from being able to drive to the beach on any given day or just signing on to AOL to talk to people....

Kev
 
what a piece of work you are, strongchick....if your karma gets any greyer, it'll be black
 
MoneyBags said:


its our fucking money thats buying the oil. that means we have some fucking interest. its our oil interest faggot.

I really don't like being called faggot by a willfully ignorant kid, but suit yourself.

The point is that the Arab world has embargoed us before... or driven up the cost of oil to the extent they precipitated a recession. They don't NEED our money. Buying oil from the Arab world is like bending over at the gas pump.

Try to get a little broader view, Moneybags.
 
musclebrains said:


The point is that the Arab world has embargoed us before... or driven up the cost of oil to the extent they precipitated a recession. They don't NEED our money. Buying oil from the Arab world is like bending over at the gas pump.


I have some funny, but true cartoons to post here in a couple of hours......some will find some humor in these, some will not......
I did. And you're right, it isn't our oil.
 
No, it's not our oil. But oil is used to describe one of our interests. And they are our interests. Hence our oil interests. If they wanted to talk about dog shit, they'd say our dog shit interests.
 
spentagn said:
No, it's not our oil. But oil is used to describe one of our interests. And they are our interests. Hence our oil interests. If they wanted to talk about dog shit, they'd say our dog shit interests.

Geeee, reallllly?

I'm simply addressing the context, spent. Our "oil interests" are about as legally protectable as my nephew's "shoe interests" at K Mart. Use of such a term implies a propietary right that simply doesn't exist. There is a strong implication that an "interest" confers a right in this thread. Excuuuuuuuuuuse me for making that point.

The Arab world can cut off the oil flow, and we're back in a major recession. Perhaps you advocate our colonizing the Middle East?
 
musclebrains said:


Geeee, reallllly?

I'm simply addressing the context, spent. Our "oil interests" are about as legally protectable as my nephew's "shoe interests" at K Mart. Use of such a term implies a propietary right that simply doesn't exist. There is a strong implication that an "interest" confers a right in this thread. Excuuuuuuuuuuse me for making that point.

The Arab world can cut off the oil flow, and we're back in a major recession. Perhaps you advocate our colonizing the Middle East?

who is saying anything about legally protectable shit? the fact is we need oil to run our shit. the arabs control a lot of fucking oil. we need to deal with those bastards. if we want to kill some people cause it will protect our ability to get oil then thats what we should do.
 
MoneyBags said:


who is saying anything about legally protectable shit? the fact is we need oil to run our shit. the arabs control a lot of fucking oil. we need to deal with those bastards. if we want to kill some people cause it will protect our ability to get oil then thats what we should do.

and by using that rationale their killing of people to protect their resource is acceptable to you as well?
 
danielson said:


and by using that rationale their killing of people to protect their resource is acceptable to you as well?

if thats what they want to do then fine. they will have to deal with whatever response to them doing it though.
 
musclebrains said:


Geeee, reallllly?

I'm simply addressing the context, spent. Our "oil interests" are about as legally protectable as my nephew's "shoe interests" at K Mart. Use of such a term implies a propietary right that simply doesn't exist. There is a strong implication that an "interest" confers a right in this thread. Excuuuuuuuuuuse me for making that point.

The Arab world can cut off the oil flow, and we're back in a major recession. Perhaps you advocate our colonizing the Middle East?

And I'm addressing the grammatical structure of the phrase "our oil interests." And noone claimed we have any legal right to the oil. Anyone who doesn't realize this doesn't need to be discussing such issues. You're excused for pointing out the obvious.

Yes, the Arab world can cut production. But we could also drastically increase our own production. Yes, the kind we have the legal right to. Perhaps you advocate our continued dependence upon the Middle East at the expense of both Israel and freedom?
 
MoneyBags said:


if thats what they want to do then fine. they will have to deal with whatever response to them doing it though.

ok

but thats how shit escalates...

we might actually wanna stop letting big oil companies exrt a huge influence on our government and divert funds into recycling programs for plastics, and alternative fuel sources. preparing for when the oil crisis actually hits us
 
i dont like the fucking dependence on oil but as long as we need it we need to protect our ability to get it. we definitely need to work on alternatives and im sure people are working on it. isnt there that guy who lives on some island that supposedly invented a bike that doesnt need gas? i read about it in maxim i think.

i dont mind escalation. as long as we are the most powerful nation in the world everyone better bend over and take it in the ass from us when we want them to.
 
MoneyBags said:
i dont like the fucking dependence on oil but as long as we need it we need to protect our ability to get it. we definitely need to work on alternatives and im sure people are working on it. isnt there that guy who lives on some island that supposedly invented a bike that doesnt need gas? i read about it in maxim i think.

i dont mind escalation. as long as we are the most powerful nation in the world everyone better bend over and take it in the ass from us when we want them to.

escalation means people dying. on both sides.
 
danielson said:


escalation means people dying. on both sides.

anyone fucks with us and there will be a lot more dying on their side. it would just make sense for them to do what we want. we could wipe out the entire arab world in a weekend if we wanted to.
 
true

we'd all suffer through the use of nukes though, when it starts raining

and what are you going to do about the muslim population in your own country.

not to mention all their oil drilling equipment would be fucked...unless you went with the neutron bomb...and you dont have that many of them i think

look how many they killed in 1 day in NY....its not meant as an insult but america has never really experienced modern warfare on its shores in recent times, pearl harbour, while terrible wasnt targetingthe civillian population. the arabs might be bombed sensless, but they are used to it. what do you think their targeting of US civillians would do to your economy. look where its heading now. which all makes others wanna step up to bat and take you on while your weak, china for one. pakistan has nukes and would launch as many as possible iof other muslims were attacked.

if it were thatclear cut for a victory they would have done it by now

plus our genetic diversity would be seriously screwed

(u send me kharma by the way money. if so thanx for signing it at least)
 
Last edited:
i dont think we would respond to this situation the way i would like us to anyway. why should the muslims in our country be a concern anyway? they wouldnt commit criminal acts against us would they? i think we should help israel to take over an oil producing nation and we make a deal where we get oil cheap in return for our military aid.

yeah i gave you the karma. i usually dont sign it when i do it just out of laziness but since everyone bitches i guess ill start signing it from now on. it was good karma i gave you.
 
MoneyBags said:
i dont think we would respond to this situation the way i would like us to anyway. why should the muslims in our country be a concern anyway? they wouldnt commit criminal acts against us would they? i think we should help israel to take over an oil producing nation and we make a deal where we get oil cheap in return for our military aid.

i dunno

this might sound xenophobic (and i apologise to anyone offended but its just my opinion of late) .....but can you really say that? i know many muslims, and one of them, one of my better friends has been involved with one of the societies in his university. now there are legitamate muslim societies at uni, and then there are the ones that brainwash you. and im sorry to say the line between the 2 can be very thin sometimes.

he's very weak minded and ive seen how he's begun to get brainwashed and actually seems happy people he knows have gone to fight for the taliban, he's slowly getting brainwashed by them. now if they can affect 1 person over here so much im sure they can do it there. normal muslims are fine butits when they get corrupted like this they become a threat. and it only takes 1 guy to kill a whole lot of people especially in the US.

(thanx for siging the kharma btw)...it was grey for some reason :confused:
 
i do think the muslims are a concern. its amazing how religion can make people so stupid. i think anyone guilty of terrorism here should be dealt with incredibly brutally. if we need to we can use the internment camps.

someone else said my karma was gray so she thought it was bad. i got some karma from some guy that was gray and he said it was good. i dont know what the deal is but just cause the karma i give is gray doesnt mean its bad.
 
MommaKin said:
what a piece of work you are, strongchick....if your karma gets any greyer, it'll be black

I care about it, NOT!

Just a discussion. Good discussions don't happen without a bit of jabbing.
 
dballer said:


How can you say that?

YOU are very racist.

I've posted quotes on this board from various threads....blatantly racist references to various races/nationalities...

...no one ever comments about these....in fact, I posted one that JohnyJuice said...

...in five minutes there was a 'caucasian pride' thread started.

so...please. Get off it. Go tell those guys they are racist. Oh...you don't have the guts...cuz they are POPULAR.

High school freaks.
 
strongchick said:


I've posted quotes on this board from various threads....blatantly racist references to various races/nationalities...

...no one ever comments about these....in fact, I posted one that JohnyJuice said...

...in five minutes there was a 'caucasian pride' thread started.

so...please. Get off it. Go tell those guys they are racist. Oh...you don't have the guts...cuz they are POPULAR.

High school freaks.

nope, the thing is they never claimed they werent racist. you on the other hand do, yet you make so many racist comments ive lost count.. typical of an irrational hypocrite, but at least youre good for a laugh.
 
MoneyBags said:
i do think the muslims are a concern. its amazing how religion can make people so stupid. i think anyone guilty of terrorism here should be dealt with incredibly brutally. if we need to we can use the internment camps.

someone else said my karma was gray so she thought it was bad. i got some karma from some guy that was gray and he said it was good. i dont know what the deal is but just cause the karma i give is gray doesnt mean its bad.

thanx anyway

thing is islam is broadly based on 3 things....the qu'ran, the interpreataions of it (has some fucked up name), and the actions of the prophet mohammed (so they know how to act as a result ofthese teachings, also fucked up name)

thing is, their religion teaches them how to act 100%....in tht the qu'ran is how u MUST act to go to paradise, but what worries me is the interpreataions of the qu'ran seem to carry so much goddamn weight to! and the fact they have to look so closely at mohammeds actions....it justg makes me tink their religion breeds automotons.....which makes it that much easier for extremists to get it and manipulate the weak minded, like my friend :(
 
Top Bottom