I've always used depot and gotten great results. I'm on Sust for the first time now, and it hasn't kicked in yet (only on 2nd week).
So I can't comment on anything other than the fact that the first two weeks of injections made my quads sore as hell (Sust is apparently known for doing this).
I also noticed that I don't have that "Horn Dog" syndrom kicking in like I do with Depot. So I'm wondering if the mixed test in Sust is less effective or more effective for gains?
Thats the the answer I was expecting to hear. This guy at my gym swears by Test depot and thinks sust is useless. I guess it all depends on the person and cycle they are on.
Thats the the answer I was expecting to hear. This guy at my gym swears by Test depot and thinks sust is useless. I guess it all depends on the person and cycle they are on.
So long as you're using high quality human grade test there is no reason for them to differ greatly.
I'm sure people have had different results with them, but there are too many variables to account for to pin point the different esters involved as the blame for lessor results with one.
At the end of the day the parent coupound is still the same. Testosterone.
I'm not sure whether I'm hornier on depot or sust. Last cycle I used sust. If I wasn't getting laid, you could find me jerking off in my room. Now I'm on depot, and well, if I'm not getting laid, you can find me in my room jacking my meat.