Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
RESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsRESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic

Splenda Contains Chlorine!

deltreefitness

New member
J&J Faces Lawsuits Over Splenda Marketing

Monday, January 31, 2005

WASHINGTON — Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is facing a raft of lawsuits over a marketing campaign related to its artificial sweetener Splenda, which accuse the company of misleading buyers to believe Splenda is a natural product.

Splenda (search), which has enjoyed rapid sales growth on the back of a boom in low-carbohydrate eating in the last couple of years, is marketed by J&J's McNeil Nutritionals Worldwide (search) division with the line: "Splenda No Calorie Sweetener is made from sugar, so it tastes like sugar."

But the Sugar Association (search) says the marketing pitch does not accurately reflect the end product and is misleading because it gives the impression that Splenda contains natural sugar.

McNeil faces three class-action suits from individuals, one from the Sugar Association and one from Merisant Worldwide Inc (search), the maker of rival low-calorie sweetener products including Equal and Canderel.

"Johnson & Johnson is misinforming consumers about the reality of the chlorinated product Splenda," said James Murphy, counsel for the Sugar Association, whose lawsuit seeks aunspecified damages, a nationwide injunction and corrective advertising.

"We feel the public needs to be aware that Splenda is an artificial chemical sweetener. Splenda is created with chlorine, and the final product does not have sugar in it," he said.

Splenda's Web Site (http://www.splenda.com) says the product is made "through a patented process that starts with sugar and converts it to a no calorie, noncarbohydrate sweetener. The process selectively replaces three hydrogen-oxygen groups on the sugar molecule with three chlorine atoms."

A spokeswoman for McNeil Nutritional told Reuters that the lawsuits had no merit.

"Consumers are utilizing no-calorie sweeteners versus other sweeteners like sugar, and you would have to draw your own conclusions about why now these efforts are being launched." said Monica Neufang, director of communications for McNeil,

"We have never represented Splenda as being natural," she said.

Splenda has just over 50 percent of the U.S. market for low calorie sweeteners, based on dollar volume, according to data collected by IRI and made available to Reuters by McNeil.

It is used in products which include Kool-Aid Jammers (search) 10 tropical Punch drink, produced by Kraft Foods.

"Obviously, any organization that represents the sugar growers of the world would like to have people know what they are buying when they are buying a sweetener," said Dan Collister, attorney at Squire, Sanders and Dempsey, acting for the Sugar Association.

Separately, the Texas Consumer Association said on Monday it had asked the U.S. Federal Trade Commission to investigate the Splenda marketing campaign.

"With consumers across the country concerned about their health and trying to eat more natural foods, it is alarming that McNeil is engaged in an underhanded campaign to confuse consumers into believing Splenda is natural," commented Sandra Haverlah, president of the Texas Consumer Association.

Haverlah said she was working with the Consumer Federation Network and was not associated with the groups bringing suits against Splenda.

No one from Merisant was available for comment.



Link

I use a lot of that shit!
 
As long as it is not a sugar and it passed through my digestive system without being recognized as a sugar, than I will continue to use it. This is pretty the only thing that the sugar company has on Splenda. Splenda is taking over so it needs to come up with something to try and draw consumers back to regular sugar. Not anywhere have I seen that splenda can be dangerous, so if its not dangerous, and its a sugar substitute than what is the problem?
 
You think it's OK to market something as "natural" when it clearly isn't? Most consumers put a lot of blind faith into the FDA.
 
Last edited:
Just because their pitch says "it tastes like sugar because it's made from sugar" doesn't mean the company is saying it's natural... like stated, the product "selectively replaces three hydrogen-oxygen groups on the sugar molecule with three chlorine atoms." That statement given by Splenda proves its a chemical product.

Stupid consumer fucks.
 
deltreefitness said:
You think it's OK to market something as "natural" when it clearly isn't? Most consumers put a lot of blind faith into the FDA.


I dont see how they are stating that the product is natural, of course it is chemically altered.
 
I love splenda but this isnt good. I dont care if its natural but chlorine!. I mean thats part of the reason I dont drink tap water. Chlorine is shown to cause cancer. Splenda officials so it passes through your body but I just read a report that says 27% of it is absorbed. I guess Im going to have to get used to unsweetened protein :rolleyes:
 
nomad12 said:
I love splenda but this isnt good. I dont care if its natural but chlorine!. I mean thats part of the reason I dont drink tap water. Chlorine is shown to cause cancer. Splenda officials so it passes through your body but I just read a report that says 27% of it is absorbed. I guess Im going to have to get used to unsweetened protein :rolleyes:


What about salt?
 
yeah, chlorine in a molocule isn't bad :rolleyes: what do you think tablesalt is? and its also contained in tons of other products also i'm sure. That whole thing in the first post is just another one of the scare tactics that nutrasweet, sweet 'n low and sugar companies are pushing to try and hurt the sales of splenda.
 
I'm going to continue to use it myself......it's pretty suspicious to me that the Sugar Mafia is suing over it.... politics as usual.....

And I've never been confused by their alleged "false" advertising......
 
Top Bottom