Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
RESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsRESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic

Periodization & HIT

Shark01

New member
I've been a long time advocate of HIT training. It's great for people with full time jobs and families, you don't do a bunch of mindless suboptimal sets, and it just makes so much sense that the clearest signal you can send to your body to grow is to try but fail to accomplish something.

Now having said that, any program gets stale after a while and there are aspects of periodization that can be really helpful, especially the micro-periodization that Leo Costa at OTS preached about.

Now the question, has anyone explored putting the two together? Going to failure for different weight/rep ranges?

Thanks!
 
Are you talking about just doing more sets, all to failure? If you mean strict periodization with multiple microcycles, you do not go to failure all the time.
 
teen1216 said:
Are you talking about just doing more sets, all to failure? If you mean strict periodization with multiple microcycles, you do not go to failure all the time.

I'm talking about keeping the same volume (# of sets) more or less, just adjusting the weight and rep ranges so you fail at lower or higher reps to simulate a power or strength cycle.
 
I don`t know about those principles you talked about Shark01, but I just read Doggcrapp`s routine/thread and it`s pretty interesting. I don`t have a link, Sorry. But then it may be the same thing you`re talking about.
 
Well, if you mean simply doing, say, 5x3 to failure with a heavy weight on squats for strength, then that is not true periodization. If you want to do this, then by all means try it, though be careful about going to failure with low rep ranges. You don't want to overtrain your CNS. You can always do something like 3x8 for size on a bodypart and 5x3 for strength. I have never intentionally tried going to failure with low reps (other than max effort work) but it would seem to work. Give it a shot!
 
Teen,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the periodization rep ranges I've seen are 6 (power), 8 (strength), and 12 (endurance). So the idea would be to alternate these phases, going to failure in all rep ranges.
 
Top Bottom