Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

PCT--more thoughts on Clomid vs Nolvadex

DrJMW

New member
I just finished reading ALR's book, Building the Perfect Beast. I highly recommend your reading this book. There was a line in this book that got me thinking about Nolvadex vs. Clomid.

I still believe that HCG use--either throughout the cycle or during a distinct PCT cycle--is required. It is imperative to rapidly increase testicular mass. Now, previously, I was touting Nolvadex as the antiestrogen of choice to use along with the HCG. Nolvadex acts as an antiestrogen here to block new estrogen formation as a result of recovery and it stimulates the pituitary to begin releasing LH again. The only pitfall with using Nolvadex is that it does, in fact, reduce IGF-1 levels. This is important--we do not want to reduce IGF-1 levels..EVER. So, let's substitute Clomid in place of Nolvadex. I believe that, despite the debate of Clomid vs Nolvadex (effectiveness, sides, etc), lowering IGF-1 levels is taboo. Clomid does everything that Nolvadex does. Clomid has not been proven to lower IGF-1 levels, as far as I know. Thanks to ALR and his great book, Building the Perfect Beast.
 
Clomid does everything that Nolvadex does.
Are you sure?? I don't think it will help prevent gyno??

Nolvadex acts as an antiestrogen here to block new estrogen formation as a result of recovery and it stimulates the pituitary to begin releasing LH again.
Nolva is more a competitive binder for estrogen, and it's more site specific..estrogen receptive breast tissue.

Dex, Fem, Aromesin(sp) are the common prescription anti-e's

This is the way I understand it, although I could be wrong.
 
nolva is far superior to clomid...

quoted from cjay from anabolic-paradise:

I have received a lot of heat lately about my preference for Nolvadex over Clomid, which I hold for all purposes of use (in the bodybuilding world anyway); as an anti-estrogen, an HDL (good) cholesterol-supporting drug, and as a testosterone-stimulating compound. Most people use Nolvadex to combat gynecomastia over Clomid anyway, so that is an easy sell. And for cholesterol, well, most bodybuilders unfortunately pay little attention to this important issue, so by way of disinterest, another easy opinion to discuss. But when it comes to using Nolvadex for increasing endogenous testosterone release, bodybuilders just do not want to hear it. They only seem to want Clomid. I can only guess that this is based on a long rooted misunderstanding of the actions of the two drugs. In this article I would therefore like to discuss the specifics for these two agents, and explain clearly the usefulness of Nolvadex for the specific purpose of increasing testosterone production.

Clomid and Nolvadex
I am not sure how Clomid and Nolvadex became so separated in the minds of bodybuilders. They certainly should not be. Clomid and Nolvadex are both anti-estrogens belonging to the same group of triphenylethylene compounds. They are structurally related and specifically classified as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) with mixed agonistic and antagonistic properties. This means that in certain tissues they can block the effects of estrogen, by altering the binding capacity of the receptor, while in others they can act as actual estrogens, activating the receptor. In men, both of these drugs act as anti-estrogens in their capacity to oppose the negative feedback of estrogens on the hypothalamus and stimulate the heightened release of GnRH (Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone). LH output by the pituitary will be increased as a result, which in turn can increase the level of testosterone by the testes. Both drugs do this, but for some reason bodybuilders persist in thinking that Clomid is the only drug good at stimulating testosterone. What you will find with a little investigation however is that not only is Nolvadex useful for the same purpose, it should actually be the preferred agent of the two.

Pituitary Sensitivity to GnRH
Studies conducted in the late 1970's at the University of Ghent in Belgium make clear the advantages of using Nolvadex instead of Clomid for increasing testosterone levels (1). Here, researchers looked the effects of Nolvadex and Clomid on the endocrine profiles of normal men, as well as those suffering from low sperm counts (oligospermia). For our purposes, the results of these drugs on hormonally normal men are obviously the most relevant. What was found, just in the early parts of the study, was quite enlightening. Nolvadex, used for 10 days at a dosage of 20mg daily, increased serum testosterone levels to 142% of baseline, which was on par with the effect of 150mg of Clomid daily for the same duration (the testosterone increase was slightly, but not significantly, better for Clomid). We must remember though that this is the effect of three 50mg tablets of Clomid. With the price of both a 50mg Clomid and 20mg Nolvadex typically very similar, we are already seeing a cost vs. results discrepancy forming that strongly favors the Nolvadex side.

But something more interesting is happening. Researchers were also conducting GnRH stimulation tests before and after various points of treatment with Nolvadex and Clomid, and the two drugs had markedly different results. These tests involved infusing patients with 100mcg of GnRH and measuring the output of pituitary LH in response. The focus of this test is to see how sensitive the pituitary is to Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone. The more sensitive the pituitary, the more LH will be released. The tests showed that after ten days of treatment with Nolvadex, pituitary sensitivity to GnRH increased slightly compared to pre-treated values. This is contrast to 10 days of treatment with 150mg Clomid, which was shown to consistently DECREASE pituitary sensitivity to GnRH (more LH was released before treatment). As the study with Nolvadex progresses to 6 weeks, pituitary sensitivity to GnRH was significantly higher than pre-treated or 10-day levels. At this point the same 20mg dosage was also raising testosterone and LH levels to an average of 183% and 172% of base values, respectively, which again is measurably higher than what was noted 10 days into therapy. Within 10 days of treatment Clomid is already exerting an effect that is causing the pituitary to become slightly desensitized to GnRH, while prolonged use of Nolvadex serves only to increase pituitary sensitivity to this hormone. That is not to say Clomid won't increase testosterone if taken for the same 6 week time period. Quite the opposite is true. But we are, however, noticing an advantage in Nolvadex.

The Estrogen Clomid
The above discrepancies are likely explained by differences in the estrogenic nature of the two compounds. The researchers' clearly support this theory when commenting in their paper, "The difference in response might be attributable to the weak intrinsic estrogenic effect of Clomid, which in this study manifested itself by an increase in transcortin and testosterone/estradiol-binding globulin [SHBG] levels; this increase was not observed after tamoxifen treatment". In reviewing other theories later in the paper, such as interference by increased androgen or estrogen levels, they persist in noting that increases in these hormones were similar with both drug treatments, and state that," …a role of the intrinsic estrogenic activity of Clomid which is practically absent in Tamoxifen seems the most probable explanation".
Although these two are related anti-estrogens, they appear to act very differently at different sites of action. Nolvadex seems to be strongly anti-estrogenic at both the hypothalamus and pituitary, which is in contrast to Clomid, which although a strong anti-estrogen at the hypothalamus, seems to exhibit weak estrogenic activity at the pituitary. To find further support for this we can look at an in-vitro animal study published in the American Journal of Physiology in February 1981 (2). This paper looks at the effects of Clomid and Nolvadex on the GnRH stimulated release of LH from cultured rat pituitary cells. In this paper, it was noted that incubating cells with Clomid had a direct estrogenic effect on cultured pituitary cell sensitivity, exerting a weaker but still significant effect compared to estradiol. Nolvadex on the other hand did not have any significant effect on LH response. Furthermore it mildly blocked the effects of estrogen when both were incubated in the same culture.

Conclusion
To summarize the above research succinctly, Nolvadex is the more purely anti-estrogenic of the two drugs, at least where the HPTA (Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Testicular Axis) is concerned. This fact enables Nolvadex to offer the male bodybuilder certain advantages over Clomid. This is especially true at times when we are looking to restore a balanced HPTA, and would not want to desensitize the pituitary to GnRH. This could perhaps slow recovery to some extent, as the pituitary would require higher amounts of hypothalamic GnRH in the presence of Clomid in order to get the same level of LH stimulation.
Nolvadex also seems preferred from long-term use, for those who find anti-estrogens effective enough at raising testosterone levels to warrant using as anabolics. Here Nolvadex would seem to provide a better and more stable increase in testosterone levels, and likely will offer a similar or greater effect than Clomid for considerably less money. The potential rise in SHBG levels with Clomid, supported by other research (3), is also cause for concern, as this might work to allow for comparably less free active testosterone compared to Nolvadex as well. Ultimately both drugs are effective anti-estrogens for the prevention of gyno and elevation of endogenous testosterone, however the above research provides enough evidence for me to choose Nolvadex every time.

Thought this would help bigbis on his quest.... Cjay
 
I agree with Nolva over Clomid for Gyno prevention. It seems to work better at binding in the chest where the problem lies. As long as we're posting other people's material...
Bill Roberts

Clomid is the anti-estrogen of choice for improving recovery of natural testosterone production after a cycle, improving testosterone production of endurance athletes, and is also effective in reducing risk of gynecomastia during a cycle employing aromatizable steroids.

While it has been claimed that Clomid "stimulates" production of LH and therefore of testosterone, in fact Clomid’s activity is achieved not by stimulation of the hypothalamus and pituitary, but by blocking their inhibition by estrogen.

Clomid is a mixed estrogen agonist/antagonist (activator/blocker) which, when bound to the estrogen receptor, puts it in a somewhat different conformation (shape) than does estradiol. The estrogen receptor requires binding of an estrogen or drug at its binding site and also the binding of any of several cofactors at different sites. Without the binding of the cofactor, the estrogen receptor is inactive. Different tissues use different cofactors. Some of these cofactors are able to bind to the estrogen receptor/Clomid complex, but others are blocked due to the change in shape. The result is that in some tissues Clomid acts as an antagonist -- the cofactor used in that tissue cannot bind and so the receptor remains inactive -- and in others Clomid acts as an agonist (activator), because the cofactors used in that tissue are able to bind.

Clomid is an effective antagonist in the hypothalamus and in breast tissue. It is an effective agonist in bone tissue, and for improving blood cholesterol.

Clomid also has the property of reducing the adverse effect of exercise-induced damage of muscle tissue. This is very significant for endurance athletes but is not very significant, if at all significant, with reasonable weight training. Clomid does not perceptibly affect gains of the weight trainer either favorably or adversely in my experience.

The drug seems to have estrogenic effects on mood, which can be beneficial (improving relationships with women by improving empathy) or can yield depression or PMS-like symptoms, but for most users there is no significant effect either way.

The claim that duration of intake should not exceed 10-14 days is incorrect. Clinical studies with male patients have been for periods of a year or longer. This error probably originates from the fact that, for use in women, due to the menstrual cycle there would obviously be no point in trying to stimulate ovulation all four weeks of the month. Thus, use in women is limited to 10-14 days. That limitation is not because of toxicity.

Clomid is in fact useful throughout a cycle if aromatizable drugs are being used. I do think however that to be conservative, one should use it no more than 2/3 of the time throughout the year or a little less.
 
Clomid is site specific; Nolvadex is not. Nolvadex blocks all estrogen receptors. Clomid blocks estrogen receptors in the breast/chest tissue among other places. Nuc, you really aren't understanding. Aromasin, Femara, and Arimidex are aromatase inhibitors. They work by inhibiting the enzyme responsible for converting testosterone to estradiol. They do not block estrogen activity. Clomid, Nolvadex, and Evista work by blocking estrogen receptors. None of these reduces the free estrogen in the blood stream. No one using proper doses of aromatizing drugs and using legitimate, proper dosing of aromatase inhibitors should experience any gyno. When one comes off a cycle, his free estrogen levels are low. Now, one starts his PCT with HCG and Clomid. Estrogen levels will begin to increase again, back to and partly above normal as a result of HCG use. This is OK, as long as you use Nolvadex or Clomid to block estrogen receptors. Both Clomid and Nolva stimulate the pituitary to release LH as well. My point was that only Nolvadex lowers IGF-1 levels, where Clomid does not.
 
that article is origionally written by Bill Llievellin..author of anabolics 2000 & 2002 and founder of molecular nutrition.
good read.
 
Fuck clomid, all it does is gives me sides and no results. Tamoxifen and HCG are all I need to bounce back very quickly.
 
Last edited:
lartinos said:
Fuck clomid, all it does is give sides no results. Tamoxifen and HCG are all I need to bounce back very quickly.

thats what im going with right now and am experiencing great results from it....2 weeks into PCT and lost no gains, my last cycle i noticed some sides from clomid and they were not pleasant one bit.....
 
i believe that you do not need the doses most people recommend ex. 300, 100,50........All you need is 100mg 7 days then 50 for however long you need it

hcg, nolv and clomid at low doses might do better than hcg and nolv alone
 
Clomid and IGF-1

A few months ago someone emailed me asking why he hasn't had any results using 6iu of GH ED for a number of months. After what seemed like endless conversation, I discovered that he was also taking 300mg Clomid EW (long story). So, I did some research on Clomid and IGF-1....

Study 1

Plasma concentrations of IGF-I decreased by 31.5% (434 +/- 84 versus 297 +/- 71 ng/ml; P: < 0.05) after 5 days of clomiphene therapy, whereas plasma concentrations of IGFBP-1 increased by approximately 28.1% (26.3 +/- 4 versus 36.6 +/- 7 ng/ml; P: < 0.05).


Study 2


In normal subjects, CC treatment led to a significant increase in estradiol (84 +/- 10 to 234 +/- 62 pmol/L, untreated and CC treated; P < 0.05) and estrone (125 +/- 14 to 257 +/- 29 pmol/L; P < 0.05) levels with a significant lowering of IGF-I levels (297 +/- 25 to 230 +/- 17 micrograms/L; P < 0.05). Similarly, in PCOS patients a significant increase in estradiol (110 +/- 11 to 245 +/- 58 pmol/L; P < 0.05) and estrone (301 +/- 32 to 401 +/- 90 pmol/L; P < 0.05) levels and a significant lowering of IGF-I levels (330 +/- 43 to 214 +/- 27 micrograms/L; P < 0.05) were observed after CC treatment.

Assuming I read that correctly there is a relationship between Clomid use and IGF-1 levels. Even though I hate the emotional sides with Clomid, it's a much more effective PCT than Nolva is for me (I've used both).
 
THX9000,

These 2 studies are basically saying that clomid decreases IGF-1 and raises estrogen? correct?

What is IGFBP-1?

Thanks
 
IGFBP-1 is a binding protein for IGF-1, but it is not the determing BP. IGFBP-3 is the determining BP. My point is: use Nolvadex if it works for you or use Clomid if it works for you. There isn't ground-breaking info, just food for thought. Either way, you need one of these for PCT. For gyno prevention DURING YOUR AROMATIZING CYCLE, I have always recommended aromasin, arimidex or femara. You still need some free estrogen to keep IGF-1 levels up.
 
Top Bottom