i dont understand something.. they were 24' on Ripleys and looked fuckin huge (i still hate him) and Arnolds were 22-3/4 (1-1/4) smaller, and valentinos look WAY bigger(Arnolds were beautiful)... is it a visual/height thing.. WTF is goin on with that...
also steiner says his are the biggest (i know they arnt), but its all fucked up, because you cant tell how big steiners are.. they could be 22, 23, 24.. no one knows...he wont measure them....