let's put an end to this never ending deca vs. Eq debate

[jumpmaster82]

everyone is always comparing these two and saying things like "dont use them together because they're so similar". The only research professional I've ever heard say this was a chemist from like 15 years ago (sry bros but I can't remember his name and couldn't find the article), but I've read other research papers on this subject where many other scientists say that guy was a nut.

I've used both deca and eq countless times and I see very little similarities. Deca is more of a pure bulker, eq is more of a lean quality much more keepable muscle. Doesn't bloat, gives more quality muscle over a longer period and gives a very lean vascular look while on.
the only real similarity I see between these two is similar strength gains, but that's the only link I've ever gotten from these two. In my experiences I would say if deca is comparable to anything, it would be test more than eq.
I think using eq and deca in the same cycle might be badass, and I'm going to try this at some point down the line. Has anyone ever ran these two together? If so, how was it? Does anyone feel the same? Maybe its just me, but I think these two are very different. And could be very useful in conjunction with each other.
What do you bros think about this ongoing never ending debate??

 

[anadrol-king]

deca= pure mass,bloat for some good strenth

eq= great vascalarity,modarate strenth,mild gains

deca i think give alot of mass and warter for some while eq wont give as mutch mass as deca imo

 

[GUARDIAN]

It´s not very common to compare Equipoise to testosterone; however a far more common comparison is between Equipoise and Deca. I suspect this is because when Dan Duchaine introduced this compound to the steroid using community, he made an immediate comparison to Deca, speculating that it would act similarly to Deca but like a much stronger version of it. Equipoise doesn´t actually act much like deca at all; Deca is actually a progestin and a 19-nor derived steroid whereas Equipoise is more closely related to testosterone (being only one double bond differ rent). Duchaine later rescinded his original statement on Equipoise and said that it was disappointing as a mass builder when compared with deca, but a far better drug than for both strength gains and vascularity. Unfortunately, the myth that Equipoise´s action is similar to Deca´s has persisted for nearly 2 decades after he revised his opinion; this is most evident on internet message boards today, where many will advise against including both of them in a cycle because "they act the same way."

-AR

 

[searay]

in the '80's the best cycle was deca - dbol. equi and dbol have the same exact chemical structure exept for the ester and of course one is oral and one is inject. so if deca-dbal was such a great cycle then why not equi-deca. ive run them together and think it is a great combo. i love deca for its joint lubricating abilities and equi for everything it does. if your gona shoot 600mg of either one i think your better off shooting 300 of each and stacking em. just my 2cc's

 

[jumpmaster82]

though eq is only one double bond away from test, I see and feel very little similarities between the 2. While eq is chemically similar, IMO the results of deca are more comparable to test than eq.

 

[perryscoon]

Wouldn't eq be closer related to primo than deca?

 

[GUARDIAN]

Wouldn't eq be closer related to primo than deca?

it is but that doesnt stop people from comparing it to deca

 

[jumpmaster82]

Wouldn't eq be closer related to primo than deca?

Finally some one says it. That's what I find eq is most comparable to.
but as 8 said that still doesn't stop the masses of juicers from making the comparison to deca.
on another note, IMO eq is the poor mans substitute for primo.

 

[ALIN]

everyone is always comparing these two and saying things like "dont use them together because they're so similar". The only research professional I've ever heard say this was a chemist from like 15 years ago (sry bros but I can't remember his name and couldn't find the article), but I've read other research papers on this subject where many other scientists say that guy was a nut.

I've used both deca and eq countless times and I see very little similarities. Deca is more of a pure bulker, eq is more of a lean quality much more keepable muscle. Doesn't bloat, gives more quality muscle over a longer period and gives a very lean vascular look while on.
the only real similarity I see between these two is similar strength gains, but that's the only link I've ever gotten from these two. In my experiences I would say if deca is comparable to anything, it would be test more than eq.
I think using eq and deca in the same cycle might be badass, and I'm going to try this at some point down the line. Has anyone ever ran these two together? If so, how was it? Does anyone feel the same? Maybe its just me, but I think these two are very different. And could be very useful in conjunction with each other.
What do you bros think about this ongoing never ending debate??

IMO i think they have a synergisitc effect when used in conjunction

 

[gstacker]

ive heard this alot of times about the eq vs deca and ive always bought into it, ive always liked deca for the mass, strength and ease of joints.....im willing to give it a run, im a fan of deca and have never ran eq before.....its been a couple years since my last cycle so my receptors should be good to go. im game as long as theres some test in the cycle. mid 30`s 20% bf 195lbs 5ft6 lets here some good ideas on a cycle with pct...... ps it would take me a few weeks to start and my bf will be down by then at least another 2-4%