I'm officially the stupidest person on this board

[DaMan]

OK, this'll top the "clambutteroil" one.

What the hell does "cutting" mean??? Until I started reading here I thought it meant losing extraneous weight, specifically water and blubber, but I keep reading that anavar, winny, primo etc. are "cutting" roids and people take them on "cutting" cycles and end up putting on like 10lbs of lean mass in a few weeks.

What the hell exactly gets "cut" then??? Is DNP considered a "cutting" drug even though there is zero added mass? (other than the anabolic rebound) And what's a "cutting" cycle then? I think my peasize brain understands what "bulking" means, just not the c-word...

Apologies in advance for bringing the intelligence of conversation on this board down by like 100 IQ points with this question...

 

[##spiderbaby##]

I was going to post a reply answering your question but then i realized you are joking...

good one. hehe



##spiderbaby##

 

[KINGKONG69]

to me cutting means droping the bf and going for the beach look. wheather your taking steriods along with a low cal diet to add a little lean mass (muscle), but mainly hold what you have while dieting, or taking dnp to purely shed fat.

 

[DaMan]

Dude, do you have to embarass me even more??? No, actually I'm serious... I can't figure out the TECHNICAL definition of what all u guys call "cutting". I thought I understood (WEIGHT LOSS!), but can't figure out how putting on 10lbs of lbm w/o bloat/fat is considered "cutting".

Could someone just give me a technical definition really quickly before people start flaming me? Thanks

 

[DaMan]

Kingkong: Thanks, that's what I thought. So I wanna put on 15lbs of lbm and lose 10lbs of blubber and don't want any bloat/water/fat (who does) and yes, go for the underwear carton guy look (altho i prolly need like another 30lbs of lbm, not 15lbs). So right now I wanna CUT, right?

Thanks!

 

[Nathan]

Here's mine:

cutting = losing fat with goal of maintaining or ideally building muscle mass

bulking = gaining muscle mass with some or ideally no bf.

HOWEVER, you CAN bulk and lose fat at the same time. So, there appears to be a conflict there as you can bulk and cut with the same results (lose fat, build muscle). In that case, I would say that it comes down to mentality and goals in mind. Namley, whatever you are setting out to do is what you are doing irregardless of the results.

 

[Andy13]

Allegations that certain AAS "will add lean mass while even on reduced calories" is compeletely pre-historic... Bill Phillips?? WAR '96?? I don't know where it originated.. but it is BS....

"cutting" AAS are steroids that are prefered during a diet b/c of lack of conversion to estrogen or binding PR's which leads to water retention and perhaps more difficult time burning fat.

Some claim that certain AAS burn fat more than others. There is a real lack of evidence that supports this and most of what you hear is anecdotal...

My feeling on anecotal evidence? Here is an analogy.. (thank you Bill Roberts)

Detergent manufacturers can provide you with tons of research showing that the same detergent, in a different colored box, is rated by consumers as being markedly different in how well it brightens and whitens their clothes.

So, I guess that's why I have such a hard time accepting anecdotal evidence.

Andy

 

[ThickLEE]

cutting=getting ripped

 

[##spiderbaby##]

sorry bro, I honestly thought u were just being retarded.

"cutting up" is just that, you can put on more lean mass without excess fat or just lose fat after a bulk cycle.

You "cut" when you need definition. You can do a bulk cutting cycle and a bulking cutting cycle but really "cutting" just means using a stack of AS to define your muscles either through losing fat while building some lean muscle mass.

I hope this helps. Just remember there is really no "definition" of cutting. One mans cutting cycle may be another's idea of a bulking cycle.


##spiderbaby##

 

[rnch]

stupidest person?

dude, there's no way YOU are the stupidest person here.

there's too many other postings on this board that have proven you wrong.

 

[The Iron Game]

Allegations that certain AAS "will add lean mass while even on reduced calories" is compeletely pre-historic... Bill Phillips?? WAR '96?? I don't know where it originated.. but it is BS....

"cutting" AAS are steroids that are prefered during a diet b/c of lack of conversion to estrogen or binding PR's which leads to water retention and perhaps more difficult time burning fat.

Some claim that certain AAS burn fat more than others. There is a real lack of evidence that supports this and most of what you hear is anecdotal...

My feeling on anecotal evidence? Here is an analogy.. (thank you Bill Roberts)

Detergent manufacturers can provide you with tons of research showing that the same detergent, in a different colored box, is rated by consumers as being markedly different in how well it brightens and whitens their clothes.

So, I guess that's why I have such a hard time accepting anecdotal evidence.

Andy

 

[Laserdude]

My brother is the dumbest on this board. I won't reveal his handle, but he thought a cutting cycle required a razor blade.

HA, HA, HA...