hgh for females

[fembrigadier]

Hi guys some say hgh is safer to gain muscle than AAS I was wondering for a females looking to gain mass what would be the ideal dose? thank you.

 

[Lev Butlerov]

HGH is great, and it really does wonders. However, there are a couple of problems with it that I don't like. First of all, it is extremely hard to find the real one these days, and there are tons of fakes sold. And if you manage to find the real one, the price will be really high, which will get even more expensive, considering the need for long cycles with HGH. As already mentioned, you need to run really long cycles, with HGH, which is not cool either. This is the reason I prefer Nutrobal to HGH - it is much cheaper, it is relatively easy to get the real thing (especially if you get it from sarms1.com), it works much faster, and it does not suppress the natural production of GH. After all, it will stimulate your natural GH production, and not just put some exogeneus GH into your body. Besides, it has the convenience of being taken orally, compared to the daily injections needed with HGH. THis is why I always recommend Nutrobal instead of HGH - you basically get the same benefits, but in a much more convenient way.

 

[stevesmi]

i would get nutrobal from sarms1, take it in the morning before breakfast. i think you will be very pleased with your results

 

[MasonicBodybuilder]

I think for females looking to gain muscle, SARMs are the best alternative to steroids. They are much safer and do not have the emasculating side effects steroids do because they are purely anabolic compounds. I would read up on the different SARMs.

 

[muskate]

Peptides such as HGH, insulin etc. are not cholesterol based. They are amino acid peptides.

Steroids, estrogen etc. are all cholesterol based hormones.

HGH can not cause emasculating side effects. HGH does not effect testosterone or estrogen levels in the body in any way.