There has been a lot of speculation that if Miami loses to Nebraska and Colorado beats Oregon, that Colorado will get a share of the title. I disagree, since Colorado has 2 losses, one being a blowout, but there is a lot of speculation nonetheless. The argument is that Colorado beat Nebraska head to head. If the previous scenario plays out, here is the question I would like to see answered: How can anyone justify putting Colorado ahead of Miami? Miami will have one loss, Colorado two losses. They didn't play head to head, so you can throw tha targument out. Colorado played a little bit tougher schedule, but not that much tougher to warrant them moving ahead of a Miami team with one less loss. Some people might be able to use the head-head competion argument for Colorado over Nebraska, but what about Miami?