Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Sarm Research SolutionsUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsSarm Research SolutionsUGFREAKeudomestic

China brinksmanship behind North Korea?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DcupSheepNipples
  • Start date Start date
D

DcupSheepNipples

Guest
Beijing could pull plug on nuclear threats against U.S. by neighbor-ally at any time

Many of you know my thoughts on China's role in the GNWO game! Like I have said before the North Korea crisis could be stopped in one second if China wanted it to end!

by Joseph Farah
03.09.2003

How Beijing could benefit from actions of 'Axis of Evil'

"North Korea is a small neighbor to China," says the report. "It could not be threatening the U.S. with nuclear missiles, as it is, without at least China's tacit support. Clearly, North Korea and China are allies. The Chinese want Taiwan. The North Koreans want South Korea. The only nation preventing both goals is the U.S."

As late as Friday, a top North Korean official warned the United States again that it now had the capability of hitting the world's lone superpower with intercontinental ballistic missiles armed with nuclear warheads.

G2 Bulletin reports that a secret deal between Washington and Beijing calls for China not to veto a new U.N. resolution authorizing force on Iraq in return for a pledge from Washington not to attack North Korea.

Though China knows the U.S. is not going to launch a pre-emptive strike against North Korea without provocation and the U.S. knows China is not going to veto the U.N. resolution, G2 Bulletin's source says this agreement is a way for Beijing to let the West know that Pyongyang is part of its geo-strategic orbit by acting as its protectorate as well as assuming a higher profile internationally.

"Could it be North Korea is not so much a 'rogue' state, as U.S. diplomats describe it, as it is a strategic ally of China?" asks G2 Bulletin.

North Korea's Kim Jong-Il visited both Moscow and Beijing in the last half of 2002, the report points out. Jiang Zemin and Vladimir Putin both visited Kim in Pyongyang last year, too.

"China and North Korea negotiated expanded trade agreements – very one-sided agreements because North Korea has nothing China needs," reports G2 Bulletin. "Meanwhile, Russia and North Korea prepared the new Friendship and Cooperation Treaty, and North Korea got greater access to Russian weaponry. In the context of those meetings and those agreements, North Korea hardly looks like a rogue state at all. It looks more like a significant component of a growing Russian-Chinese alliance."

U.S. officials are concerned that North Korea could export plutonium from its nuclear weapons program, as well as weapon-design data, to Iran and other Middle East nations willing to pay for it. In the worst-case scenario, the Koreans move forward with the production of nuclear bombs and then stockpile enough to have a surplus for sale to the highest bidders.

What can be done about this? Precious little, say G2 Bulletin intelligence sources.

"North Korea is already thought to have the ability of hitting U.S. West Coast targets with nuclear missiles," the report says. "Recently, a North Korean warhead from a test-fire was reportedly found in Alaska. Should the U.S launch a pre-emptive strike on North Korea's nuclear facilities, it would have no defense against a limited nuclear attack. The U.S. has no missile defense system."

In addition, North Korea also threatens to launch a conventional invasion of South Korea, a war that could cost the U.S. tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of casualties.

"It seems China, and Russia, don't have much to lose in backing North Korea's bellicose stand against the U.S." concludes G2 Bulletin. "Not much to lose and, perhaps, plenty to gain."

http://g2.wnd.com
 
Communist China - Disarm Or Else!

Dont you just love the NWO!

By Devvy Kidd
NewsWithViews.com
3-10-3

In a scant few months, millions of words about Saddam Hussein and his "weapons of mass destruction" have been penned to paper and spoken on TV and radio. I just returned from Boston and Washington, DC. I took Amtrak from Sacramento to Boston to New Haven, CT, down to Washington, DC, back to Chicago and then home to Sacramento.

One meets a large cross section of Americans from every walk of life on such a long trip. Not one single person I spoke with wants this war with Iraq. From taxi cab drivers in Waltham, Massachusetts, to vacationers on the train off the farm in Iowa, it was the talk from coast to coast. Everyone questioned: Why? The most common comments were: Saddam Hussein is no threat to the U.S. or the Bush Administration has not been truthful to the people of these united States of America.

But what about Communist China?

From a February 29, 2000, piece titled, "China Threatens U.S. with missile strike," by Bill Gertz of the Washington Times reported:

"China stepped up its war of words over Taiwan yesterday, bluntly threatening to fire long-range nuclear missiles at the United States if it defends the island."

Now, that's as direct a threat as one can get against the united States of America by our mortal enemy, the Communist Chinese.

Why hasn't Mr. Bush demanded that Communist China immediately disarm and destroy those nukes pointed at US?

The answer is simple: Trade. On October 20th of 2001, President Bush was in Shanghai with President of China Jiang Zemin.

This was only a few short months after the April 1, 2001 downing of our U.S. Navy EP-3E Aries II surveillance plane by Zemin's military cowboys. The Chinese F-8 fighters that played such a dangerous game, carried air-to-air missiles sold to China by Israel. Twenty four Americans, after a miraculous emergency landing, were then held as prisoners. Eleven days later and after thoroughly stripping down this $80 million dollar airplane and breaking our sensitive defense code, the commies released our freedom fighters and sent us back a heap of salvageable airplane parts.

During those 11 days our military personnel were being held, Americans were wringing their hands in worry. The yellow ribbons went up on trees. Rightfully so, Americans were steaming big time and the families of those 24 crew members were fearful for the well being of their children, husbands and daughters.

Mr. Bush then issued an apology to the widow of the pilot who shot down our plane. Americans reeled from such a slap in the face to our honor by our own President. Mr. Bush called this international incident of deliberate aggression an accident.' Don't rock the trade boat, Mr. President. As a matter of fact, some excellent investigative reporting by Charles R. Smith on Oct. 3, 2001, exposed more of the ugly truth about America's foreign policy:

"Newly released documents show that U.S. Air Force officials met with Chinese military officers in June 2001 to discuss U.S. possible military aid for China.

"According to documents, the meetings took place inside China despite the "policy issues surrounding the (at that time unresolved) EP-3 situation."

While we were all sitting around praying for the safe return of our 24 crew members, only two months later, it was business as usual. These types of secret meetings aren't set up in two days. You can bet the arrangements were being made while our military were being held and We the People were made fools of - again. What did Ronald Rumsfeld tell Mr. Bush a mere two weeks before this downed plane, hostage incident?

"....China now perceived as the principal threat to American global dominance."

Really? That would be late March, 2001. By October 2001, Rumsfeld's boss was in Communist China, frocked in the latest fashion from Beijing and making nice with mass murderer, Jiang Zemin.

In April 1997, the Ruskies and Communist Chinese President Jiang Zemin, the butcher of Beijing, signed a formal New World Order agreement in which they pledged to replace the U.S. as the world's lone superpower.

These people are playing for keeps and anyone who thinks otherwise is either in a state of denial or hasn't done their homework on these two communist countries. Communism is not dead in Putin's world - as long as the gold goes into his own private bank accounts.

One month after the President of the united States of America was in schmoozing with Zemin:

News Telegraph, UK November 3, 2001

Beijing Produces Videos Glorifying Terrorist Attacks on 'Arrogant' US

By Damien McElroy

"The Chinese state-run propaganda machine is cashing in on the terror attacks in New York and Washington, producing books, films and video games glorifying the strikes as a humbling blow against an arrogant nation.

"Communist Party officials say President Jiang Zemin has obsessively watched and re-watched pictures of the aircraft crashing into the World Trade Center. In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, workers at Beijing Television worked round-the-clock to produce a documentary they called Attack America.

"As rescue workers pick through the rubble of the twin towers, the commentator proclaims that the city had reaped the consequences of decades of American bullying of weaker nations.

"He said: "This is the America the whole world has wanted to see. Blood debts have been repaid in blood. America has bombed other countries and used its hegemony to deny the natural rights of others without paying the price. Who until now has dared to avenge the hurts inflicted by unaccountable Americans."

Two months after 9-11, one month after Mr. Bush was in Shanghai playing nice with Zemin and what do we see? Jiang Zemin and his fellow countrymen celebrating the 9-11 attack against America. Wear Made in China or Hong Kong? I'd rather go naked.

Russia: Disarm now!

October 25, 1999 Washington Post

Russia Threatens U.S. Over National Missile Defense System

"The Russian military on Monday threatened the United States over it's intention to create and implement a national anti-ballistic missile system. Nikolai Mikhailov, Russia's first deputy Defense Minister told reporters that "Our arsenal has such technical capabilities to overcome any antimissile defenses. This technology can realistically be used and will be used if the United States pushes us toward it."

It is our right to develop whatever weapons systems our talented people can create to defend our shores. Again, this was a direct threat to America by a foreign power. When will Mr. Bush demand that Vladimir Putin completely disarm and destroy all of his nukes, backed up by threats of war? It won't happen. Too many of Bush's big GOP money donors are doing big business inside Russia.

Here's a small helping of what the Ruskies and Chinese have been up to over the past few years: "The developing anti-U.S. alliance between Russia and China continues to grow. The Pentagon recently discovered a new area of alarming secret cooperation: nuclear weapons." Bill Gertz & Rowan Scarborough, January 14, 2000, WND

On the eve of Mr. Bush's inauguration, January 2001, his future and anti-American new National Security Advisor, Condi Rice, chosen for her color, gender and unwavering support for a new world order, was quoted at a cocktail party as saying: "We don't have any reason to trust Putin."

But wait! Within just a few short months, June 2001 while Mr. Bush was in in Ljubljana, Slovenia to meet with Vladimir Putin, aka The Gray Cardinal, Bush decided within two hours of meeting him that Putin was a man he could trust. Bush's remarks--"I looked the man in the eye," he said, and "I was able to get a sense of his soul."... "I trusted him or I wouldn't invite him to my ranch."

Does anyone else find these inconsistencies as frightening as I do?

Those who clamor for war aren't going to war

Popular cheerleaders for the Bush administration and his unconstitutional war, i.e. Shawn Hannity, Armstrong Williams, Dan Abrams, Newt Gingrich and so many others, have become shrill and desperate on television and radio over the past month or so as they realize the American people do not want this war.

While these 'experts' are beating the drums of war like nothing I've ever seen before, I notice that not a single one of them has gone down and enlisted in this all volunteer military force. Nor do they have sons in the military who could be deployed to the Middle East to fight Mr. Bush's war for oil. But, they're falling all over themselves to send your son, husband or father into harm's way. Why do they do this? Because they're party hacks who put party loyalty above the truth, God, flag and country.

These well paid mouthpieces don't understand the game. I say game because that's exactly what this is: a game of power. One must study how the Masters of the Globe think, what they've done over the past 227 years and how they play the people of this country for suckers. I weep for my Republic and for our precious freedom fighters being sent, once again, to become cannon fodder for the world banking cartel who own the puppets who run our government.

This unconstitutional war against Iraq isn't about terrorism, it's about solidifying a one world system by systematically knocking off one country after another, setting up puppet governments that can and will be controlled by the IMF - the cost of which will be astronomical and handed down to your children and grandchildren.
 
Top Bottom