Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Barry wants to take my sedatatives away when the dr "violates" me

Welcome to clinicoeconomics!

It will be the new norm shortly.
 
Hoarding has its advantages.

me thinks the $500 savings will discourage this preventative procedure and cost Uncle Sug moar in the long run



just sayin'


The extra treatment added an average of about $500 to an insured patient's bill in 2009, and $150 to a Medicare bill.
 
In CR gastroscopys are done with topical throat anesthesia and wide awake :worried: that's what you get with socialized medicine.... needless to say I got mine privately/paying
 
me thinks the $500 savings will discourage this preventative procedure and cost Uncle Sug moar in the long run



just sayin'


The extra treatment added an average of about $500 to an insured patient's bill in 2009, and $150 to a Medicare bill.

That's a key element of the new health care -- curb demand.
 
The doctor should just spit on your butthole then slide that apparatus right on in Rocco Siffredi style.
 
I would think you'd be ok with stripping the unnecessaries out of entitlements.

I'm against the government even being part of the decision.

If the government simply has to insert itself into health care, I'd vastly rather give the patient a voucher and let them shop for the colonoscopy they want. There are dozens of decisions to make (doc versus PA, sedation or not, inpatient versus outpatient, etc)
 
When the study kicked off, 14 percent of these tests included an anesthesiologist. That climbed to more than 30 percent by 2009. The portion of this extra sedation treatment given to low-risk commercially insured patients remained constant during the study and fell slightly in Medicare fee-for-service patients. But the study authors said far too many low-risk patients are still getting this treatment - more than three-fourths of the commercially insured patients and two-thirds of the Medicare group.

To me, nothing screams "quality healthcare" more than not having an anesthesiologist administering my anesthesia.
 
To me, nothing screams "quality healthcare" more than not having an anesthesiologist administering my anesthesia.

Twilight is far from what people think of anesthesia in tthe OR. You don't need an anesthesiologist to give you some versed and fentanyl.

Come on plunk, you're arguing for the sake of arguing.
 
To me, nothing screams "quality healthcare" more than not having an anesthesiologist administering my anesthesia.

0626_conrad_murray_ap060708045483-1.jpg
 
Twilight is far from what people think of anesthesia in tthe OR. You don't need an anesthesiologist to give you some versed and fentanyl.

Come on plunk, you're arguing for the sake of arguing.

If your baby was getting twilight anesthesia tomorrow morning, would you want an anesthesiologist in the room or would you be fine with the physician doing the procedure monitoring that as well?
 
If your baby was getting twilight anesthesia tomorrow morning, would you want an anesthesiologist in the room or would you be fine with the physician doing the procedure monitoring that as well?

I'd be fine with it. I've used twilight and ketamine sedation on young children before without the presence of anesthesia. If you can hear a beeping monitor, place an oral pharyngeal airway, and have access to flumazenil and naloxone, it's pretty damn easy. If things get out of hand, I can tube just about anybody and am certified to do so in newborns on up.

The article is talking about low risk screening procedures like colonoscopies, so you're twisting and taking things out of context.
 
I'd be fine with it. I've used twilight and ketamine sedation on young children before without the presence of anesthesia. If you can hear a beeping monitor, place an oral pharyngeal airway, and have access to flumazenil and naloxone, it's pretty damn easy. If things get out of hand, I can tube just about anybody and am certified to do so in newborns on up.

The article is talking about low risk screening procedures like colonoscopies, so you're twisting and taking things out of context.

Which brings up another point...

I'd want propofol if someone is going to stick a scope up my ass and mill around. I'd want lots of propofol and a healthy dose of Versed beforehand just to insure retrograde amnesia.
 
Which brings up another point...

I'd want propofol if someone is going to stick a scope up my ass and mill around. I'd want lots of propofol and a healthy dose of Versed beforehand just to insure retrograde amnesia.

Really? Because it sounds like in the post before, you were worried about safety. How would propofol be safer? Or is it the coolness factor that attracts you?
 
Which brings up another point...

I'd want propofol if someone is going to stick a scope up my ass and mill around. I'd want lots of propofol and a healthy dose of Versed beforehand just to insure retrograde amnesia.

Also, I know a GI clinic in Vegas that would love to scope you with propofol. Gimme your info and I'll hook you up.
 
Really? Because it sounds like in the post before, you were worried about safety. How would propofol be safer? Or is it the coolness factor that attracts you?

Propofol in the hands of a really good, attentive anesthesiologist in a state-of-the-art facility is safe enough for me.
 
Which brings up another point...

I'd want propofol if someone is going to stick a scope up my ass and mill around. I'd want lots of propofol and a healthy dose of Versed beforehand just to insure retrograde amnesia.

I'd settle for a couple of White Russians......I mean....
 
Top Bottom