Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Asian Hunter Killer has already played the race card!

Razorguns

Well-known member
Gee -- what a surprise!

Now immigrant groups will come to his rescue. Protray stories of how enemies killed his family back in the day. Images of past horrors came to mind and he became traumatized and delusional. He's not really a killer in real life. It wasn't pre-meditated. He was just trying to save himself from their threats, which he took seriously due to his violent horrific past, etc.

So... the victims have already become the bad guys. That didn't take long.

http://www.nbc4.tv/news/3942087/detail.html

Suspect In 6 Hunters' Deaths Says They Called Him Racist Names

Six Hunters Slain, Two Injured

HAYWARD, Wis. -- A man suspected in the killings of six hunters told investigators he began firing after he was shot at first and some of the victims called him racially derogatory names, according to documents filed Tuesday.

A judge set bail at $2.5 million for Chai Vang, 36, of St. Paul, Minn., who is suspected in the killings Sunday of six deer hunters and the wounding of two others.

Bail was set after investigators filed documents arguing there was probable cause to hold Vang in the shootings. No charges have been filed.

Vang, a Hmong immigrant from Laos, was arrested Sunday about four hours after the shootings as he emerged from the woods with his empty SKS 7.62 mm semiautomatic rifle.

Sawyer County Sheriff Jim Meier said a dispute over Vang's use of a tree stand -- a raised platform used by hunters -- on private property preceded the gunfire.

Vang told investigators he didn't realize he was on private property when he climbed the tree stand, according to the probable-cause statement released Tuesday.

A hunter approached Vang to tell him he was on private property, and Vang started to leave as other hunters approached, the statement said. Vang said the hunters surrounded him, and some started calling him racial slurs.

Vang said he started walking away but looked back to see the first hunter point his rifle at him and then fire a shot that hit the ground 30 to 40 feet behind him, the statement said.

That's when Vang told investigators he started firing at the group, and some fell to the ground and others tried to run away, according to the statement.

Five people died at the scene and a sixth died Monday in a hospital. Two others were wounded. The dead were identified as the landowner, Robert Crotteau, 42; his son Joey, 20; Al Laski, 43; Mark Roidt, 28; Jessica Willers, 27; and Denny Drew, 55, who died Monday at St. Joseph's Hospital in Marshfield. Willers' father, Terry Willers, remained hospitalized Tuesday in fair condition, while the other wounded hunter was released.

Officials said the victims were part of a group of 14 or 15 who made their opening-weekend trip to the 400-acre property an annual tradition.

"This was his first time out with that group. He was delighted to be invited," said Karen Roidt, mother of victim Mark Roidt.

According to an account by authorities Monday, two or three hunters spotted a man in a hunting platform on Crotteau's land, then radioed back to the rest of the party at a cabin nearby, and were told no one should be there.

Chai Vang is accused of killing six deer hunters and wounding two more in a dispute over a hunting platform on private property during the opening weekend of deer season.


One of the men approached the intruder and asked him to leave, as Crotteau and the others in the cabin hopped on their all-terrain vehicles and headed to the scene, according to the account.

"The suspect got down from the deer stand, walked 40 yards, fiddled with his rifle. He took the scope off his rifle, he turned and he opened fire on the group," Meier said.

One of the men called for help on his radio, and those who arrived to help also were shot, authorities said.

He was "chasing after them and killing them," Deputy Tim Zeigle said. "He hunted them down." There was only one firearm among the eight hunters and it was unclear whether anyone returned fire, authorities had said.

Some Hmong leaders had questioned whether racial differences may have figured in the shootings.

Sang Vang said his family was devastated, and that his brother has lived in the United States for more than 20 years and is a U.S. Army veteran.

Minneapolis police said they arrested Vang on Christmas Eve 2001 after he waved a gun and threatened to kill his wife. No charge was brought because she didn't cooperate with authorities, spokesman Ron Reier said. Police in St. Paul said there had been two domestic violence calls to his home in the past year, but both were resolved without incident.

There have been previous clashes between Southeast Asian and white hunters in the region. Locals in the Birchwood area, about 120 miles northeast of the Twin Cities, have complained that the Hmong, refugees from Laos, do not understand the concept of private property and hunt wherever they see fit.

Vang's arrest left some Hmong citizens in his hometown fearful of a backlash, and a group of Hmong leaders in St. Paul condemned the shootings Tuesday and offered condolences to victims' families.

"What happened in Wisconsin is in no way representative of the Hmong people and what they stand for," said Cha Vang, who said he was representing "the greater law-abiding Hmong community." He is no relation to Chai Vang.

About 24,000 Hmong live in St. Paul, the highest concentration of any U.S. city. And the shooting has already provoked racial tension in an area of Wisconsin where deer hunting is steeped in tradition.

Minnesota state Sen. Mee Moua rejected the idea that cultural differences played any role in the shooting.

"We're all just speculating that may have been a trigger for him," said Moua, who is Hmong. "We're all searching for answers."
 
god riddence with the rednecks. now just gas the asian guy so no one comes out the victor.
 
"Vang told investigators he didn't realize he was on private property when he climbed the tree stand, according to the probable-cause statement released Tuesday.

A hunter approached Vang to tell him he was on private property, and Vang started to leave as other hunters approached, the statement said. Vang said the hunters surrounded him, and some started calling him racial slurs.

Vang said he started walking away but looked back to see the first hunter point his rifle at him and then fire a shot that hit the ground 30 to 40 feet behind him, the statement said."





this wouldnt suprise me, I already saw on the news those same hunters got into a fist fight with another asian group previously.
 
im not going to eat in any chinese restaurants for awhile, they may put poision in my eggroll as payback to the white people
 
Boy whatcha doing on my property .......get your gook ass off of it now...

it'll come down to self defense, but hard to prove, since he shot at the whole group...w/only one rifle present...

i'm sure it wasn't like ...excuse me, but you are on private property, please leave immediately....its he said / he said at this point...

i'm sure Vang was leaving and happened to turn around and see a rifle pointed at him... don't think the hunter was planning to shoot or shot at him....but maybe just putting Vang in his cross hairs..... but if thats the case, thats self defense to shoot back... but not mow down the whole group....
 
he will never got off with self defense, he shot 8 freakin people ..which makes me wonder...if atleast a couple of them had a gun (which im sure they did, they wouldnt confront a tresspasser without their rifles)....how shitty of a shot are they or how good of a shot is he...
 
if they all threatened him with racist remarks and guns -- he has the right to open fire and defend himself. Well maybe not cmpletely legally -- but enough that a judge may find pity on him and "understand" his circumstance and lessen his punishment.

Kinda like if a black man in the woods alone comes across 8 klansman with guns pointed at him -- what are his options???
 
Well Charlie was tresspassing, then he shot the white men. No excuses since he was a tresspasser and deserved all kind of remarks. He should consider himself lucky this country allowed his ass to grow instead of living in some shithole in Asia...
 
Even if he doesn't get charged with murder he's gonna have a death sentence walking around him everyday. I wouldn't be surprised if someone puts a bullet in his head while he's out walking to a court date.
 
No matter what somebody said to the guy or even treatened him, he did not have the right to kill all those folk. No sir, not one of them. The fucker should fry...who the hell did he think he was? RAMBO!

PEACE
Booger...
 
velvett said:
Even if he doesn't get charged with murder he's gonna have a death sentence walking around him everyday. I wouldn't be surprised if someone puts a bullet in his head while he's out walking to a court date.

You're such a pessimistic pale bitch!!!

The cold hard realist in Velvetteer.....:redhot:




DIV

:chomp:
 
ok we all know the story... how the hell does one man kil 6 and wound 2 while he is untouched?

wouldnt they shoot back at him?


wisconsin dudes = pussies or just bad shots?
 
I don't live in a red state-- is it common to hunt deer with an assault rifle?

And you guys fight over tree stands like normal people do over women?
 
Ffactor said:
Broly, do you think anybody really cares about six rednecks being killed?

Like my negative Karma said....

You fucking asshole! There were some young people that were killed there. I don't think such an ass as yourself will understand until someone you love is killed.

I hope that never happens, but I also hope some sort of misery comes your way for that comment.
 
Yarg! said:
god riddence with the rednecks. now just gas the asian guy so no one comes out the victor.

Word! I can tell you exactly what happened. This guy has no idea its private property. He gets on the deer stand. All of a sudden he is surrounded by 8 rednecks threatening him and shouting racial slurs. The guy gets down and starts walking off. The crowd of rednecks continue heckling him and one of them takes a shot. The Asian guy goes postal. I'm as sure of this as I am of my car being broken into if I park in the ghetto and leave my cell phone in the car. It's all about genetics. Some people are genetically pre-disposed to acting a certain way. I have no respect for them.
 
If the one hunter pointed a rifle at him, then Vang had the right to defend himself and take that hunter out...guess realizing he is in BFE and SOL in the woods and outnumbered 6-7 to 1, decided self preservation...kill or be killed.. thats what i think happened....there's no way in hell i'm getting out of here alive after taking out one hunter...they're gonna hunt me down and skin me alive out here in the woods...

wouldn't be surprised at all if some of the hunters had been drinking.....several friends/neighbors i have talked to that hunt and bring whiskey with them to keep warm....and why did just one of them have a rifle ???? figure all of them would be armed coming after a trespasser... heck i would....shotgun and sidearm....

either way, Vang is a walking deadman in that town...
 
Ffactor said:
It's all about genetics. Some people are genetically pre-disposed to acting a certain way. I have no respect for them.

BINGO !!!! Like why a third of all black males between 18 and 30 are either in prison, on bail awaiting trial or on parole.
 
He was on private property. That says alot. I mean even if they called him racist names he was still on their property. He is guilty. In Texas you can be shot for poaching on private property. They should have just shot'em.
 
Maybe I read the story different you than you all, but I thought it said the rednecks only had one gun between them and it was a pistol. The nipper had an assault rifle.
Fish in a barrel. That answers peoples questions about why you need an assault rifle to go hunting, its just in case you want to go postal.
 
jestros said:
Maybe I read the story different you than you all, but I thought it said the rednecks only had one gun between them and it was a pistol. The nipper had an assault rifle.
Fish in a barrel. That answers peoples questions about why you need an assault rifle to go hunting, its just in case you want to go postal.

The SKS is not an assault rifle.

http://www.surplusrifle.com/sks/index.asp
 
tiger88 said:
ok we all know the story... how the hell does one man kil 6 and wound 2 while he is untouched?

wouldnt they shoot back at him?


wisconsin dudes = pussies or just bad shots?

Read it dude,they only had one gun between them.
 
jestros said:
Well, if you want to get technical, but we all know it is cheaply and easily modified into one. It's dirt cheap as well.

So an assault weapon is a dirt cheap rifle which looks mean ? Damn, I'm glad to know my G36K is so expensive and looks like a Star Trek weapon....
 
manny78 said:
So an assault weapon is a dirt cheap rifle which looks mean ? Damn, I'm glad to know my G36K is so expensive and looks like a Star Trek weapon....
didnt say anything about looking mean. And can we assume he had a 30 shot banana clip on there? Sounds like he was lettin loose quite a bit.
 
jestros said:
didnt say anything about looking mean. And can we assume he had a 30 shot banana clip on there? Sounds like he was lettin loose quite a bit.


SKS come with a 10 round clip only. The SKS-D can take 30 rounds mag. BTW you can stick a 30 round mag on a bolt-action rifle and will still be able to kill everyone at McDonald's if you wish....
 
manny78 said:
SKS come with a 10 round clip only. The SKS-D can take 30 rounds mag. BTW you can stick a 30 round mag on a bolt-action rifle and will still be able to kill everyone at McDonald's if you wish....
From the artical it sounds like he fired more than 10 shoots. Like I said an sks can be easily modified to take a 30 shotter. I remember the first time I saw an SKS in a gun store, it was like $120, and the guy told me it was easy to get a big banana on there.
You know about guns, how much time does it take to fire 10 rounds with a bolt action vs a semi-auto? Big difference there. If he had a bolt action I am sure more people would have escaped.
I AM NOT saying all semi auto rifles should be banned, but IMHO, hunters who hunt with them are wimps.
 
He has learned well in his 27 years in America. You shoot eight people, blame them. You kill your child, it's not your fault, it's society's. We can't take responsibility for anything we do anymore, it's always someone elses fault. :(
 
jestros said:
From the artical it sounds like he fired more than 10 shoots. Like I said an sks can be easily modified to take a 30 shotter. I remember the first time I saw an SKS in a gun store, it was like $120, and the guy told me it was easy to get a big banana on there.
You know about guns, how much time does it take to fire 10 rounds with a bolt action vs a semi-auto? Big difference there. If he had a bolt action I am sure more people would have escaped.
I AM NOT saying all semi auto rifles should be banned, but IMHO, hunters who hunt with them are wimps.

Well, maybe the guy knew about reloading his rifle ? he fired 20 shots which is 2 clips.

As for bolt-action, if it's a short action it's pretty fast. I mean look at the German army during the WWII or the british, their main rifle was a bolt-aciton (K98 and Lee Enfield). I agree for a newbie it's a pain in the ass but for an experienced shooter, it's not that bad...
 
I have an sk....and btw - who in the hell hunts deer with one??


lol
 
He's already beig made into the good guy, and the victim racist rednecks who deserved it. Gotta love the media and his legal defense!
 
DIVISION said:
I'm dissapointed in you, Shadowz.

You are better than this.^^^





DIV

:chomp:


LOL

WAs that directed at you??

if so....it was for Ulcast
 
Ffactor said:
Word! I can tell you exactly what happened. This guy has no idea its private property. He gets on the deer stand. All of a sudden he is surrounded by 8 rednecks threatening him and shouting racial slurs. The guy gets down and starts walking off. The crowd of rednecks continue heckling him and one of them takes a shot. The Asian guy goes postal. I'm as sure of this as I am of my car being broken into if I park in the ghetto and leave my cell phone in the car. It's all about genetics. Some people are genetically pre-disposed to acting a certain way. I have no respect for them.

I response to your Negative Karma:

"Who the fuck are you to talk to me fucking Canadian!"

Apparently I'm a person who has more compassion and respect for the people that lost their lives here. Not only that, but you're walking a very thin line of racism with your comments here. I don't know the general semantics of what exactly caused this inccident, and neither do you.

While it's true that some combinations of genes can have an effect on how people behave, you are yet again showing what an asshole you are with this comment. If what you say is true, are your children destined to be assholes themselves?

If I could leave more negative karma for you I would.
 
Last edited:
So, since I am from Wisconsin that must make me a redneck asshole too? Fuck all yall. This guy is not the innocent angel you have all been led to believe. He has been in trouble for beating the shit out of his wife twice. Apparently, he just snapped one day and beat her ass. She wouldn't press charges though and a little while down the road he snapped again and beat her ass. Again, she didn't press charges. They are also finding connections now between this guy and an unsolved murder that happened a while back. Yeah, it seems a hunter was hunting in that same area and someone shot his ass and left him for dead. Weird huh? So all you fucking pricks hating on Wisconsin can just eat my ass with a spoon. He was on posted private property in someone else's deer stand. This would be like you coming out of a store and finding someone sitting in your car. You tell him to get the fuck out and he then shoots your ass.
 
I always thought redneck meant southern people.

Well, I guess we are south of Canadia, so I suppose that Canadians can call us Wisconsin people rednecks. I'm sure they're just acting out in anger at all the Canada-bashing threads that are posted. Eh?

Now what was this thread about again? Oh yeah... guns.
 
Calling someone a redneck is no better than using racist slang to describe any other group of people. Just because these people were hunting, doesn't make them slack jawed, tobacco chewing honky tonk, hee haws.

It's an offensive term.

Those that use it should be banned according to the TOS from this site. Unless it's now ok to use the N word, the C word, the G word, or any other damned racial slur you want to. FuckheadFactor, and anybody like him should stfu, or be forced to leave.
 
NJjuice22 said:
"Vang told investigators he didn't realize he was on private property when he climbed the tree stand, according to the probable-cause statement released Tuesday.

A hunter approached Vang to tell him he was on private property, and Vang started to leave as other hunters approached, the statement said. Vang said the hunters surrounded him, and some started calling him racial slurs.

Vang said he started walking away but looked back to see the first hunter point his rifle at him and then fire a shot that hit the ground 30 to 40 feet behind him, the statement said."
I'm with you
U.S. army vet too




this wouldnt suprise me, I already saw on the news those same hunters got into a fist fight with another asian group previously.
I'm with you
U.S. army vet too
 
Ffactor said:
Broly, do you think anybody really cares about six rednecks being killed?

Broly, do you think anybody really cares about six N****** being killed?

How offensive is that?

That's my point. Not only are you showing what an ass you are, but what kind of racist shithead you are too. It also feeds well into the topic at hand. The race card will be played as a defence, because it will bank on people's prejudices and stereotypes.
 
manny78 said:
Well, maybe the guy knew about reloading his rifle ? he fired 20 shots which is 2 clips.

As for bolt-action, if it's a short action it's pretty fast. I mean look at the German army during the WWII or the british, their main rifle was a bolt-aciton (K98 and Lee Enfield). I agree for a newbie it's a pain in the ass but for an experienced shooter, it's not that bad...
but the german's used their MG42 to deal out the death
the bolt actions were just to protect the MG crew
the whole german squad tactical doctrine was based on protecting the MG and feeding it with ammo
we didn't adopt these tactics until nam with the M60
a german squad could be attrited down to 4 men,but so long as 2 of them manned the MG,the firepower of the squad wasn't affected
 
China made a pretty highly regarded rifle in WWII....perhaps this was it.

I think the guys who got shot were drunk as hell and Wang was ready to pop in the worst way. He is toast.

Private property, six dead and only one was armed supposedly.

One thing to beat someone up, another to kill them.
 
WTF is one chinese guy doing in the middle of nowhere, knowing there are hudreds of white red necks with guns all around him?
 
gymrat said:
WTF is one chinese guy doing in the middle of nowhere, knowing there are hudreds of white red necks with guns all around him?
confidence
 
and I doubt the results would have been different if they had all been armed
what was that line in one of the boot camp scenes in Full Metal Jacket?
something along the lines of "this is what one motivated marine can do with a rifle"
refering to both Oswald and the guy in the tower at the U. of Texas
 
Firebaall said:
Broly, do you think anybody really cares about six N****** being killed?

How offensive is that?

That's my point. Not only are you showing what an ass you are, but what kind of racist shithead you are too. It also feeds well into the topic at hand. The race card will be played as a defence, because it will bank on people's prejudices and stereotypes.


so a "redneck" is a race? whoa.. ive been missing out.
 
Yarg! said:
so a "redneck" is a race? whoa.. ive been missing out.

Here you go fuckhead:

Main Entry: red·neck
Pronunciation: 'red-"nek
Function: noun
1 sometimes disparaging : a white member of the Southern rural laboring class
2 often disparaging : a person whose behavior and opinions are similar to those attributed to rednecks
- redneck also red·necked /-"nekt/ adjective


While not a recognized ethnic group, that term is used as a derogatory description for a group of caucasian people. It's as racist as someone saying "cotton picker" or similar terms. Are you suggesting the term "cotton picker" isn't a racist term? Do you believe that there is a race "cotton picker"?

Damn you are stupid. It's a good thing there isn't a "stupid" race. That way I can call you a stupid fuck and still be politically correct.

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=redneck
 
wow you get excited easily don't you? did ur redneck father beat the shit outta you when you were a kid? anyways... to use your rather poor example against you:

you claim that the term "redneck" is a derogatory comment aimed at (generally) white people from the (generally) southern rural laboring class. however, "redneck" is a generalized term for pretty much every white person who partake in the (generally) souther rural labor class' lifestyle. whereas, the term "cotton picker" is catered towards those strictly of african ethnicity. thus, "cotton picker" would be racist, whereas "redneck" , would not- unless, ofcourse; the southern labor class was a race.
 
Yarg! said:
wow you get excited easily don't you? did ur redneck father beat the shit outta you when you were a kid? anyways... to use your rather poor example against you:

you claim that the term "redneck" is a derogatory comment aimed at (generally) white people from the (generally) southern rural laboring class. however, "redneck" is a generalized term for pretty much every white person who partake in the (generally) souther rural labor class' lifestyle. whereas, the term "cotton picker" is catered towards those strictly of african ethnicity. thus, "cotton picker" would be racist, whereas "redneck" , would not- unless, ofcourse; the southern labor class was a race.

Stupidity and ignorance bothers me. So your argument bothers me. My "definition" of redneck isn't my own creation. It's lettered plain as day in the dictonary. I'm sorry if you didn't understand the definition correctly. What didn't you understand? I'll make an attempt to cure you of your ignorance for the sake of reducing your misconception of the world.

Here's the definition with the important, and key words highlighted for the sake of your oversight.

Main Entry: red·neck
Pronunciation: 'red-"nek
Function: noun
1 sometimes disparaging : a white member of the Southern rural laboring class
2 often disparaging : a person whose behavior and opinions are similar to those attributed to rednecks
- redneck also red·necked /-"nekt/ adjective

Note the key words "a white" and "attributed". Do you need more help understanding how the words "a white" refers to a specific race? Do you need help to see how "attributed" is a synonym for a stereotype in this example? I'm not going to do all your homework here for you bud. Once you gain a stronger knowledge of the English language, we can continue. I suggest you read the definition of racism. It will help you construct your future arguments.

Personally I'm just sick of everybody's double standard and those that don't understand that they even use them.
 
for one, i never said it was your definition. i just used your example:

"While not a recognized ethnic group, that term is used as a derogatory description for a GROUP of caucasian people. It's as racist as someone saying "cotton picker" or similar terms. Are you suggesting the term "cotton picker" isn't a racist term? Do you believe that there is a race "cotton picker"?"

i simply stated, the difference between the term red neck being used to describe a group of caucasians from the southern labor class (as stated in the dictionary), and the term "cotton picker". unless those group of caucasians from the southern labor class were a race themselves; yes, it would be RACIST. however, not every WHITE person is from the southern labor class, so thus; it would not be refering to the white RACE as a whole. now the term "cotton picker" is used against black skinned/culture/tradition people (same as the N word) and seeing as all black people are black, that term would be RACIST.
 
Yarg! said:
whereas, the term "cotton picker" is catered towards those strictly of african ethnicity. thus, "cotton picker" would be racist, whereas "redneck" , would not- unless, ofcourse; the southern labor class was a race.

Ahhh heck...

While we're at it.

Please tell those cotton picking Egyptians to stop leaving their mummies everywhere....being as they are from an African ethnicity and all.

I can explain the humour in this barb at the expense of your statement if needed.
 
Yarg! said:
unless those group of caucasians from the southern labor class were a race themselves; yes, it would be RACIST. however, not every WHITE person is from the southern labor class, so thus; it would not be refering to the white RACE as a whole. now the term "cotton picker" is used against black skinned/culture/tradition people (same as the N word) and seeing as all black people are black, that term would be RACIST.

While you are padding your argument with the truth that "all black people are black", you are failing to see that "redneck" is a derogatory word exclusively used against a group of white people. When someone uses "redneck" as a descriptive force, are you picturing any other colour of skin than a white man's? Just becuase it narrows down on a specific social sub grouping, that in it's own rights isn't a nationality, doesn't mean it can't be considered racist.

Truely think that through.
 
When someone uses "redneck" as a descriptive force, are you picturing any other colour of skin than a white man's? "

as a matter of fact.. yes. to me redneck is also a lifestyle choice- such as calling a gay person a "fag" (or though that gay person may not nessecarily be a certain skin color).
 
one of my best friends is black
on the way to the beach
in alabama you travl via interstate about an hour.5
and then go an hour and half over "country" roads
I heard him comment over and over about redneck this and redneck that
heh
 
redneck is an offensive term to use when describing white people.

nigger is an offensive term to use when describing black people

BUT !!!!
one black can call another black a nigger and it is not offensive
one white can call another white a redneck and it is not offensive

The use of these terms BY WHOM and in what context determines whether these terms are offensive.

The problem you have in recognizing this, YARG!, is that you believe only white people can be racist, therefore any derogatory terms used against whites are not inhehently racist but any terms used against blacks are.

The multicultural agenda pushed in public discourse in America today NEEDS TO marginalize white people and maintain the arguement that all whites are racist if it to continue.
 
Yarg! said:
When someone uses "redneck" as a descriptive force, are you picturing any other colour of skin than a white man's? "

as a matter of fact.. yes. to me redneck is also a lifestyle choice- such as calling a gay person a "fag" (or though that gay person may not nessecarily be a certain skin color).


Then this is your problem. You don't understand how the term is defined. By the very definition it refers to white people ( directly in terms of a specific sub culture ). You personally might not regard the term "redneck" as referring to white people alone, but that doesn't mean that you are correct.

You have a misconception that needs to be resolved before you can make a vaild argument. You personally don't define the words in the English language. If you can't understand this, then arguing this point is beyond your capacity. I'm sorry, this is the truth. You are ignorant in this matter, and you don't see that the world isn't defined by your personal standards or understanding.

It's sad how ignorance is the breeding ground for racism, and that your mind is fertile for it to take hold.
 
Last edited:
Yarg! said:
When someone uses "redneck" as a descriptive force, are you picturing any other colour of skin than a white man's? "

as a matter of fact.. yes.

Please inform me of what other skin colours you are thinking of? You really need to go back over that definition. Is English a second language for you? All I can reason for your lack of understanding, is that perhaps you are a French Canadian, and need help with the translation. If not the case, there is a lacking in your mental capacity.

Here's a big list of hate that you might understand my point better:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_slurs

Funny how your "non racist" term makes the list of ethnic slurs. I hope you find this educational in regards to seeing how your "non racist" term finds company. After going to this extreme, if you don't understand, I'll understand that you lack the compassion or capacity to comprehend.
 
Last edited:
well, since there is another person who supports ur side here, then i rest my case. as for "lifestyle choice" well it could be anyone who leads the "redneck" lifestyle. and no... i dont think white people are the only racist ones, hengst. and no matter what u tell/show me , i refuse to believe that "redbeck" is a racist term. its not because im stupid , but because of a little thing called cognitive dissonance. this being a free country, i shall practise it as i so chose. well ill just leave u with this though:
in your reference of racial slurs it is stated "Redneck- U.S., an rural, unrefined white person", and unless Im mistaken, a rural unrefined white person is not from a seperate race. true, hes white, but hes not on his own race. besides what good is a reference when it makes silly grammatical errors- after all, it should be the undisputed athority of all things racial. anyways... im off; ta ta! or should i say au revoir!
 
Last edited:
Yarg! said:
well, since there is another person who supports ur side here, then i rest my case. as for "lifestyle choice" well it could be anyone who leads the "redneck" lifestyle. and no... i dont think white people are the only racist ones, hengst. and no matter what u tell/show me , i refuse to believe that "redbeck" is a racist term. its not because im stupid , but because of a little thing called cognitive dissonance. this being a free country, i shall practise it as i so chose. well ill just leave u with this though:
in your reference of racial slurs it is stated "Redneck- U.S., an rural, unrefined white person", and unless Im mistaken, a rural unrefined white person is not from a seperate race. true, hes white, but hes not on his own race. besides what good is a reference when it makes silly grammatical errors- after all, it should be the undisputed athority of all things racial. anyways... im off; ta ta! or should i say au revoir!

It is a free country, and you do have the right to be wrong. You say that you are resting your case, but then continue to argue? I'll just have to concede that you are too head stong, and narrow minded to see that you are in error.

I posted that weblink to show you how the term kept company with other nasty terms of the same substance, not as a end all termination to your arguement. You are grasping at straws now. You can't make a decent stand anymore on your view point, and it's just too bad that you are too stubborn to admit that your view on the world could be screwy. You say that no matter what I show or tell you, you refuse to believe that it is a racist term. Then you've already determined to be close minded, and and full of prejudice. You don't even realize it.

Exactly what racism needs to survive. Way to go!

I'd still like to know what other skin colours, you see when this term is used. You forgot to address that point.....funny.

Now....one parting question, are you really a French speaking Canadian? lol

Hell....let's just let the puppets help:

http://www.avenueq.com/video/racist_high.ram
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom