Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

Letter to the House Committee on the Recent Legislation on the Use of AAS in Sports

George Spellwin

The Architect
Staff member
Administrator
Elite Moderator
Moderator
<p>This article from <a href="http://www.elitefitness.com/go/meso/main" target="_blank">Meso-Rx</a> is <a href="http://www.elitefitness.com/go/meso/suicide" target="_blank"></a>an open letter to the Members of the House Committee on Government Reform on the <a href="http://www.elitefitness.com/go/meso/openletter" target="_blank">Recent Hearings and Legislation on the Use of Anabolic Steroids in Sports</a>. Here's an excerpt and link to the article. </p> <p><a href="http://www.elitefitness.com/go/meso/openletter" target="_blank">An Open Letter to the Members of the House Committee on Government Reform on the Recent Hearings and Legislation on the Use of Anabolic Steroids in Sports</a><br> by Philip Sweitzer, J.D.</p> <p>It is time for some difficult truth telling. That is the purpose of this letter: to force confrontation of the evidence, much of which Congress seems to want to avoid in a perpetuation of "war on drugs" hype and hypocrisy. The March 17, 2005 hearings before the House Committee on Government Reform showed Congress at its worst, the poison of loaded rhetoric dripping from every turn of phrase. "Illegal" was a favorite word throughout the proceeding. So were the terms "teenagers" and "idolize" and "faith." In the hands of a politician, those are all terms of art. They make simple issues of the complex, reduce the need for scientific justification for policy that should be inherently scientific, rather than being based on more generalized moral notions of "cheating." </p> <p>Unsurprisingly, therefore, not only was truth-telling not the proceeding’s goal; rather, it wasn’t even a desired effect. This was pure advertising, pure "war on drugs" marketing hype, pure pandering to the political constituencies. With Social Security reform dead in the water, the president’s poll numbers plummeting, the war in Iraq going badly, and a growing "public suspicion" of Congress’s penchant for injecting itself into intensely personal and private matters - the moralizing over steroids in sports was ill-timed and ill-conceived, to say the very least. At worst, it represented a subversion of congressional authority, because it based legislative policy on known misrepresentations of scientific fact. </p> <p><a href="http://www.elitefitness.com/go/meso/openletter" target="_blank">Read more...</a></p>
 
George Spellwin said:
<p>This article from <a href="http://www.elitefitness.com/go/meso/main" target="_blank">Meso-Rx</a> is <a href="http://www.elitefitness.com/go/meso/suicide" target="_blank"></a>an open letter to the Members of the House Committee on Government Reform on the <a href="http://www.elitefitness.com/go/meso/openletter" target="_blank">Recent Hearings and Legislation on the Use of Anabolic Steroids in Sports</a>. Here's an excerpt and link to the article. </p> <p><a href="http://www.elitefitness.com/go/meso/openletter" target="_blank">An Open Letter to the Members of the House Committee on Government Reform on the Recent Hearings and Legislation on the Use of Anabolic Steroids in Sports</a><br> by Philip Sweitzer, J.D.</p> <p>It is time for some difficult truth telling. That is the purpose of this letter: to force confrontation of the evidence, much of which Congress seems to want to avoid in a perpetuation of "war on drugs" hype and hypocrisy. The March 17, 2005 hearings before the House Committee on Government Reform showed Congress at its worst, the poison of loaded rhetoric dripping from every turn of phrase. "Illegal" was a favorite word throughout the proceeding. So were the terms "teenagers" and "idolize" and "faith." In the hands of a politician, those are all terms of art. They make simple issues of the complex, reduce the need for scientific justification for policy that should be inherently scientific, rather than being based on more generalized moral notions of "cheating." </p> <p>Unsurprisingly, therefore, not only was truth-telling not the proceeding’s goal; rather, it wasn’t even a desired effect. This was pure advertising, pure "war on drugs" marketing hype, pure pandering to the political constituencies. With Social Security reform dead in the water, the president’s poll numbers plummeting, the war in Iraq going badly, and a growing "public suspicion" of Congress’s penchant for injecting itself into intensely personal and private matters - the moralizing over steroids in sports was ill-timed and ill-conceived, to say the very least. At worst, it represented a subversion of congressional authority, because it based legislative policy on known misrepresentations of scientific fact. </p> <p><a href="http://www.elitefitness.com/go/meso/openletter" target="_blank">Read more...</a></p>

good article!
 
more people need to understand and support the cause, great read.
 
I love my country, ill do whatever is needed, but sometimes these assholes in congress make some decisions that boggle my mind. Ive come to the conclusion that what the gov cannot tax they make "illegal" until they find a way to do so.
 
Top Bottom